Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Teague Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 16, 2021

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. A clear plastic bag of chicken was not dated or labeled A clear plastic bag of hamburger patties was not dated or labeled. This failure could place the residents who ate meals prepared in the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: During an observation of the freezer on 06/14/21 at 8:29 a.m., there was an unlabeled clear bag of raw chicken and an unlabeled clear bag of raw hamburger patties with no date. During an interview on 06/14/21 at 9:36 a.m., Cook A said the weekend cook didn't label or date the chicken and hamburger patties before putting it back in the freezer. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Nov 26, 2024

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designated to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 4 (Resident #24, Resident #14, Resident #11, and Resident #86) of 8 residents reviewed for infection control. CNA C and CNA D failed to wash their hands and change their gloves when removing a soiled brief and placing a clean brief during peri care observation for Resident #11. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF558Feb 26, 2026

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of resident's needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health and safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident's #5's call light was within reach on 02/24/26. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs not being met.Findings included:Record review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 02/24/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Feb 26, 2026

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment for Resident #2 due to MDS assessment reflected resident did not receive anti-anxiety medication. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their care and treatment needs assessed to ensure necessary care and services were provided.Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 02/25/26, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. […]

• No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600Jan 20, 2026

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from verbal sexual harassment by CNA A in November of 2025. This failure could place residents at risk of ongoing sexual harassment, psychosocial harm, fear, and decreased quality of life.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 01/20/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]