Azalea Trail Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Grand Saline, Texas · CCN 675253
17 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 43
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 72
- Ownership
- For profit - Individual
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Van Zandt · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 5
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 1
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jul 29, 2026
103 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.35 | 3.22 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.29 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 26.8% | 53.9% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2100.0% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Azalea Trail Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Jul 29, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for oxygen use. The facility failed to securely store oxygen cylinder when in resident room on 7/27/26. This failure could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe environment. Findings included: 1. A record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 07/28/2026, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Nov 19, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #1) The facility failed to care plan the bed alarm being discontinued on 07/21/25 for Resident #1. The facility failed to care plan Resident #1's fall with major injuries on 08/06/25. These failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and not receiving needed services. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Nov 17, 2021
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the person-centered care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for care plans. (resident#13) The facility did not revise Residents #13's care plan to include her actual indwelling catheter. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of care and life. Finding included: Record Review of a Matrix for providers (used to identify pertinent care categories) dated 11/2020 indicated Resident #13 did not have an indwelling Catheter. Record Review of an MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #13 had diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF800Nov 17, 2021
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a diet to met the needs of 1 of 17 residents reviewed for physician orders. (Resident #8) The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 received magic cup and yogurt with every meal as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate treatment and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of the physician order dated November 2021 indicated Resident #8 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type 2 diabetes, anorexia, and cerebral infarction (stroke). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Nov 17, 2021
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain clinical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 2 of 17 residents reviewed for accuracy and completeness. (Resident #s 8 and 15) Resident #8's care plan inaccurately reflected she was taking an anticoagulant when she was not. Resident #15's care plan inaccurately reflected she had a foley catheter when she did not have one. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 43 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 29, 2026Standard1 finding
- Nov 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 17, 2021Standard5 findings
- Jun 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 25, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Nov 2, 2020Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
- Feb 13, 2020Standard1 finding
- Feb 21, 2019Standard3 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Aug 1, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Mar 2, 2018Standard4 findings
- Jan 5, 2017Standard6 findings
- Jan 14, 2016Standard5 findings
- Mar 25, 2015Standard and complaint1 finding
- Mar 12, 2014Standard1 finding
- Feb 27, 2013—1 finding
- Feb 8, 2012—5 findings
- Mar 16, 2011—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction