Deficiency Index

Azalea Trail Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Grand Saline, Texas · CCN 675253

17 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
43
Surveys
17
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/17

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
72
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
Independent
County
Van Zandt · rural
Medicare-certified since
1994

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
5
Staffing
3
Quality measures
1

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jul 29, 2026

103 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.353.22
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.29—
Annual nurse turnover26.8%53.9%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 2 of the 43 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Azalea Trail Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Jul 29, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for oxygen use. The facility failed to securely store oxygen cylinder when in resident room on 7/27/26. This failure could place residents at risk of living in an unsafe environment. Findings included: 1. A record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 07/28/2026, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Nov 19, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #1) The facility failed to care plan the bed alarm being discontinued on 07/21/25 for Resident #1. The facility failed to care plan Resident #1's fall with major injuries on 08/06/25. These failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and not receiving needed services. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Nov 17, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the person-centered care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for care plans. (resident#13) The facility did not revise Residents #13's care plan to include her actual indwelling catheter. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of care and life. Finding included: Record Review of a Matrix for providers (used to identify pertinent care categories) dated 11/2020 indicated Resident #13 did not have an indwelling Catheter. Record Review of an MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #13 had diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF800Nov 17, 2021

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a diet to met the needs of 1 of 17 residents reviewed for physician orders. (Resident #8) The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 received magic cup and yogurt with every meal as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate treatment and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of the physician order dated November 2021 indicated Resident #8 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type 2 diabetes, anorexia, and cerebral infarction (stroke). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Nov 17, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain clinical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 2 of 17 residents reviewed for accuracy and completeness. (Resident #s 8 and 15) Resident #8's care plan inaccurately reflected she was taking an anticoagulant when she was not. Resident #15's care plan inaccurately reflected she had a foley catheter when she did not have one. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 43 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 29, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Nov 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 17, 2021Standard5 findings
  • Jun 7, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 2, 2020Complaint3 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 13, 2020Standard1 finding
  • Feb 21, 2019Standard3 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
  • Aug 1, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 2, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Jan 5, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Jan 14, 2016Standard5 findings
  • Mar 25, 2015Standard and complaint1 finding
  • Mar 12, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Feb 27, 2013—1 finding
  • Feb 8, 2012—5 findings
  • Mar 16, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction