Deficiency Index

Royal Meadow View Center

North Reading, Massachusetts · CCN 225478

29 surveys since 2011, 13 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
138
Surveys
29
Harm or worse
13
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse13

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/29

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
113
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ROYAL HEALTH GROUP
County
Middlesex
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 80 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Jun 8, 2026

154 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.453.64
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.68—
Annual nurse turnover57.7%40.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2571.4%E617.1%F411.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 35 of the 138 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6042×

    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6582×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Royal Meadow View Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Apr 28, 2022

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1), who was severely cognitively impaired, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from abuse when it was reported by two staff members that they witnessed Nurse #1, on two separate occasions, interact with Resident #1 in a verbally abusive and threatening manner. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy and Procedure titled, Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident Property and Involuntary Seclusion, dated as revised on 1/09/2019, indicated each resident has the right to be free from abuse and must not be abused by anyone, including staff. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in July 2021. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF607Apr 28, 2022

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1), who was severely cognitively impaired, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse Policy, when two staff members failed to immediately report allegations of verbal abuse to the Executive Director or designee. When during the course of a facility investigation it was determined that a staff member witnessed and failed to report an incident in which Nurse #1 verbally abused Resident #1, that had occurred in October 2021, therefore placing Resident #1 and other residents at risk for the potential to be abused. Approximately one month later, a second staff member witnessed Nurse #1 verbally abusing Resident #1, and also failed to immediately report the incident. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 17, 2022

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision during a meal, resulting in a fall with injury for 1 Resident (#41) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Resident # 41 was admitted to the facility in 10/19 with diagnoses including dementia, [CONDITION(S)] and dysphagia (trouble swallowing). Review of Resident #41's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and scored a 3 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF692Feb 17, 2022

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to identify and address significant weight losses for 3 Residents (#36, #59 and #62) out of a total of 20 sampled residents. 1. Resident #36 was admitted in 02/2019 with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Review of the nutrition care plan for Resident #36 indicated the following: - Resident # 36 is at nutrition risk due to increased nutrition needs, inadequate oral intakes, unintentional weight loss due to [CONDITION(S)], picky eating, increased nutrition needs. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF580Jul 28, 2021

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had been evaluated in the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) after a fall in the Facility, and was diagnosed with a contusion of his/her right elbow, the Facility failed to ensure nursing notified Resident #1's Physician to obtain orders to treat his/her pain. On 07/07/21, upon return from the ED, Resident #1 requested pain medication from Nurse #1 and was told by Nurse #1 he/she did not have any pain medications available, Resident #1 continued to request pain medication from Nurse #1 throughout the night, but was told he/she had no orders for pain medication. […]

Read 33 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 33 of 138 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 8, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 29, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Jan 31, 2025Standard13 findings
  • Mar 15, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 29, 2024Standard18 findings
  • Feb 8, 2023Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 19, 2023Standard10 findings
  • Apr 28, 2022Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
Show the 21 earlier surveys
  • Feb 17, 2022Standard11 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 28, 2021Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Mar 10, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 24, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 4, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jan 30, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 4, 2019Standard10 findings
  • Mar 5, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 8, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 24, 2018Standard and complaint18 findings
  • Mar 29, 2018Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 21, 2017Standard5 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 19, 2016Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 8, 2016Standard8 findings
  • Jan 14, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Nov 27, 2013—6 findings
  • Oct 10, 2012—4 findings
  • Jun 26, 2012—3 findings · 2 harm
  • Oct 27, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction