Royal Gardens Healthcare
Alhambra, California · CCN 055818
52 surveys since 2011, 4 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 230
- Surveys
- 52
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 43
- Ownership
- For profit - Individual
- Chain
- SERRANO GROUP
- County
- Los Angeles
- Medicare-certified since
- 1968
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Apr 16, 2026
207 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.53 | 4.36 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.17 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 58.5% | 36.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D4258.3% | E2636.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B45.6% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6564×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6864×
Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
- F8424×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5583×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F5843×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Royal Gardens Healthcare, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, patternF925Aug 23, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program in the facility and failed to prevent mosquito bites affecting three out of three sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) in accordance with facility ' s policy and procedure. These deficient practices had the potential to result to serious illness and has the potential to affect all 33 residents if the mosquitoes were able to enter and bite the residents in the facility. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF921Aug 27, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and provide a safe and comfortable environment including maintain temperature within 71-81-degree Fahrenheit when the west wing air-conditioning unit (AC Unit #A) became nonfunctional on 8/26/2026 at 5 AM. This deficient practice not only exposed residents, visitors and staff to excessive room temperatures but also had the potential to cause residents to experience heat-related illnesses, such as heat cramps (painful muscle cramps and spasms), heat exhaustion (more severe than heat cramps and results from a loss of water and salt in the body), and heat stroke (the most severe form of heat illness, occurs when the body's heat-regulating system is overwhelmed by excessive heat. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF558Aug 21, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs by failing to ensure that the call light device (one of the major communication technologies that links nursing home staff to the needs of residents) was within reach and answered timely for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 1 and 3). This failure had the potential to cause a delay in care for Residents 1 and 3 and prevent the residents from receiving the necessary care and services, which could lead to illness or serious injury.Findings: 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Apr 16, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with the professional standards of practice for two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Resident 4 and 7) by failing to:Continue and provide wound care treatment per physician (MD) orders for Resident 4.Ensure Resident 7 was seen by a pain specialist (a doctor who has specialized fellowship training in evaluating, diagnosing, and treating acute, chronic, or cancer-related pain) from 1/16/2026 to 4/16/2026 in accordance with the MD order. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Apr 16, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their infection control policy and procedure for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 1 and 3) by:1. Not ensuring Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) changed gloves and performed hand hygiene (washing hands with either an alcohol based hand sanitizer or washing hands) when going from dirty to clean task during wound care treatment for Resident 3 and did not perform hand hygiene after doffing (taking off) personal protective equipment (PPE; clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) after leaving the Resident 3's room.2. […]
Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 230 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Aug 21, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 16, 2026Complaint5 findings
- Apr 9, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 8, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 23, 2026Standard and complaint21 findings
- Jan 13, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Aug 21, 2025Complaint2 findings
Show the 44 earlier surveys
- Aug 11, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jul 22, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 22, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Mar 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Dec 5, 2024Standard12 findings
- Sep 30, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 31, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Jul 3, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Dec 20, 2023Complaint3 findings
- Dec 10, 2023Standard17 findings
- Jul 17, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 19, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Mar 4, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Dec 2, 2022Standard17 findings
- Aug 23, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 12, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jun 17, 2022Complaint1 finding
- May 31, 2022Complaint1 finding
- May 3, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Apr 27, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Mar 16, 2022Complaint1 finding
- May 11, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Feb 5, 2021Infection control2 findings
- Oct 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Apr 21, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Mar 17, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 19, 2019Standard12 findings
- Jun 17, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jun 3, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Oct 4, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jul 20, 2018Standard11 findings
- Jun 4, 2018Complaint3 findings
- Apr 27, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jul 22, 2017Standard15 findings
- May 30, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Apr 26, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Aug 13, 2016Standard12 findings
- Jun 7, 2015Standard7 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 14, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Feb 15, 2014Standard14 findings
- Oct 31, 2012—20 findings
- Apr 28, 2012—10 findings
- Apr 16, 2012—1 finding
- Aug 7, 2011—10 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction