Deficiency Index

Feather River Care Center

Oroville, California · CCN 055612

65 surveys since 2011, 9 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
230
Surveys
65
Harm or worse
9
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file38/65

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
50
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
AJC HEALTHCARE
County
Butte
Medicare-certified since
1980

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jan 29, 2026

284 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.184.36
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.46—
Annual nurse turnover58.2%36.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$59,794 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ11.2%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD5264.2%E2328.4%F56.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 81 of the 230 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6566×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F5505×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6574×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F5843×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6003×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Feather River Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jan 10, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a system was implemented to alert staff when residents exited the building onto the outside resident patio area. This affected 1 (Resident #26) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. On 09/20/2023 at approximately 3:00 AM, Resident #26 exited the facility without staff's knowledge and sustained a fall. It was determined the provider's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.25(d) Accidents, at a scope and severity of J. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Mar 21, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment when: 1a. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) I wore the same isolation gown (worn over clothing and used to prevent the spread of infection) while providing care to Resident 24 (who was diagnosed with Clostridium difficile, C-diff, a bacterium that caused diarrhea, was spread from person to person by direct contact, could cause serious illness, hospitalization , or even death) and Resident 23 (who was not diagnosed with C-diff); and 1b. There was no dedicated cleaning equipment for Resident 24's bathroom; and 2. The nurse's station counter was chipped and not able to be disinfected. These failures had the potential to spread infection. Findings: 1a. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 7, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the laundry practices were implemented, and handled and processed in a safe and sanitary manner when numerous bags of soiled laundry were observed to be overflowing the laundry room and stored inside a broken dryer. This failure had the potential to spread disease and infection throughout the facility. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy titled, Policies and Practices - Infection Control, revised 10-2018, indicated: 1. This facility ' s infection control policies and practices are intended to facilitate maintaining a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent and manage transmission of disease and infections. 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jul 15, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored, prepared and distributed in accordance with professional food safety standards when: 1. The kitchen was not sanitary. 2. Staff were not wearing aprons. 3. Fixed equipment (equipment that cannot be cleaned in the dish washer or in the three-compartment sink) was not washed and rinsed prior to sanitizing. 4. Food was not stored, labeled, dated or discarded appropriately. 5. Nutrition supplements stored on medication carts and distributed by nursing during medication administration were not monitored for safe temperatures, stored or discarded within food safety guidelines. 6. The ice machine was not sanitary. 7. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF813Jul 15, 2021

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to help residents, their families and other visitors understand safe food handling practices for food brought in from outside sources. This failure has the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illness for residents receiving food brought in by their families or others. Findings: A review of the undated facility policy titled Food: Safe Handling for Foods from Visitors directs staff how to handle food safely after it is brought in, but there is no indication safe food handling education is provided to residents or their family members regarding food they bring to the resident. […]

Read 29 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 29 of 230 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 29, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 28, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 13, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 25, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 9, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 1, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 26, 2025Complaint3 findings
Show the 57 earlier surveys
  • Jun 6, 2025Complaint4 findings
  • Jun 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 23, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 21, 2025Standard8 findings
  • Dec 2, 2024Complaint4 findings
  • Sep 26, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 9, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 26, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 20, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Jun 11, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 6, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Apr 4, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Feb 7, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 10, 2024Standard18 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 15, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 27, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 29, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 7, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • May 22, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 30, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 27, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 15, 2021Standard12 findings
  • May 10, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 25, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 12, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 28, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 20, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Feb 1, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 1, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 31, 2018Complaint5 findings · 3 harm
  • Aug 6, 2018Complaint5 findings
  • Jun 15, 2018Standard13 findings
  • Apr 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 12, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 12, 2017Standard29 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 6, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 4, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 9, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 18, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 16, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2016Standard and complaint17 findings
  • Jun 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • May 7, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Jan 6, 2015Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • May 20, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 13, 2013—13 findings
  • Oct 29, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 16, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 23, 2013—2 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 9, 2012—9 findings
  • Apr 10, 2012—1 finding
  • Oct 19, 2011—14 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction