Deficiency Index

Napa Community Health Center

Napa, California · CCN 555207

27 surveys since 2011, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
149
Surveys
27
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file20/27

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
49
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
Independent
County
Napa
Medicare-certified since
1985

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
4
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 252 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jun 5, 2026

157 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.924.36
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.97—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$31,430 across 3 penalties
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG35.8%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2038.5%E917.3%F2038.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 52 of the 149 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5522×

    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.

  • F6052×

    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Napa Community Health Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF658Jun 5, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the nursing staff failed to provide care that met professional standards of nursing for two residents (Resident 3 and Resident 8) of 16 sampled residents when:1. Nurses did not assess, prevent, and identify the development of a pressure injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) on Resident 3's left cheek; and,2. Nurses did not notify the physician when Resident 8 experienced significant and progressive weight loss.These failures resulted in Resident 3 obtaining a facility-acquired Stage 2 pressure injury (a partial-thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow open sore or wound) and Resident 8 unhappy and concerned about her weight loss. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF692Jun 5, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 8) of four sampled residents received necessary care and services to prevent continued weight loss when:Resident 8's weight loss went unaddressed;Nursing staff did not notify the physician of Resident 8's weight loss; and,There was no Registered Dietician to provide oversight.These failures decreased the facility's potential to maintain Resident 8's nutritional status (the state of health determined by balance of nutrient intake, absorption, and the body's physiological needs) which placed Resident 8 at risk for worsening malnutrition, further weight loss, and a decline in overall health. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF757Mar 26, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) Black Box Warnings (or BBW, the most stringent safety warning required by the FDA for prescription drugs) and manufacturer specification for dosing a fentanyl transdermal patch (a powerful synthetic opioid, 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine, that is absorbed through the skin for consistent pain relief) for one of three sampled patients, Resident 1 when:1. Resident 1's fentanyl patch initiation on 11/26/25 did not follow FDA Black Box Warnings and manufacturer specification on starting dose based on history of opioid use, old age, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (or COPD, a long-term lung inflammation and obstruction, making it hard to breathe without medication or… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF550Jun 5, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were exercised when:1. A census of 24 residents and/or their Responsible Parties (RP) were not informed about their right to vote on June 2, 2026 for a primary election for state government elected officials; and,2. One resident (Resident 22) of three sampled residents did not have their final wishes followed when staff allowed family members to sign their Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms when they did not have the legal authority to do so.These failures resulted in 24 residents not being informed of their right to vote by the facility, and Resident 22 being consented as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) by people who were not authorized to make that decision. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF801Jun 5, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's Administration failed to ensure the Dietary Manager (DM) had the required qualifications to manage the facility's kitchen in a skilled nursing facility in California.This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure safe food handling and the prevention of food-borne illness in a highly susceptible population of 24 residents. Cross Reference F835Findings:In an interview on 6/4/26 at 9:45 a.m., DM stated he had been employed at the facility for six years and had been in the position of DM for approximately three months when the previous DM resigned. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 149 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 5, 2026Standard19 findings · 2 harm
  • Mar 26, 2026Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 28, 2025Standard14 findings
  • Feb 12, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 26, 2024Standard8 findings
  • Sep 12, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 25, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Aug 12, 2021Infection control1 finding
Show the 19 earlier surveys
  • Oct 6, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 4, 2020Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 16, 2019Standard18 findings
  • Jun 20, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 20, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Jul 12, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 8, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Mar 28, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 22, 2016Standard11 findings
  • Apr 12, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 30, 2015Standard9 findings · 3 harm
  • Apr 13, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 30, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 25, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Apr 18, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2013Standard15 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 26, 2012—6 findings
  • Apr 9, 2012—6 findings
  • Mar 7, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction