Deficiency Index

Royal Braintree Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

Braintree, Massachusetts · CCN 225058

22 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
120
Surveys
22
Harm or worse
10
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse10

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file17/22

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
204
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
ROYAL HEALTH GROUP
County
Norfolk
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.

Last survey on record

Feb 11, 2026

271 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.593.59
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.65—
Annual nurse turnover29.9%34.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1854.5%E1133.3%F26.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B26.1%C—
CMS’s current file: 33 of the 120 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6992×

    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F5651×

    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Royal Braintree Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Feb 11, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program with documentation of the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions or performance improvement activities. Specifically, the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action for resident concerns regarding food temperatures.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program, last reviewed in January 2025, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) principles will drive the decision making within our organization. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF868Feb 11, 2026

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee which included the required members at their meetings. Specifically, the facility's Infection Preventionist failed to attend three of three QAPI meetings reviewed.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance on (sic) Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, dated as revised January 2025, indicated but was not limited to:-The facility Administrator is responsible and accountable for developing, leading and closely monitoring our QAPI program.-QAPI activities will be governed and monitored by the Quality Assurance and Assessment (QAA) committee which will include: -The Medical Director, or designee -The Director of Nursing… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF680Jun 3, 2021

    Based on interviews, documentation review, and personnel record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's activity program was directed by a qualified activities professional. Findings include: During an interview on 5/26/21 at 8:01 A.M., the Administrator said that the facility's Activity Director is also the Dementia Special Care Unit's (DSCU) Therapeutic Activity Director (TAD). Review of a staff listing document titled, Who's Who at Royal Braintree, indicated the facility's Activity Director was identified as the same staff member identified as the TAD for the DSCU. During an interview on 5/26/21 at 10:10 A.M., the DSCU Consultant said she comes to the facility two or three times a month. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Feb 11, 2026

    Based on review of Resident Council Minutes, a resident group meeting, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure grievances/complaints brought forward from the Resident Council were addressed and resolved in a timely manner to ensure the residents felt their concerns were acted upon and included the facility response to the group.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Council Meetings, last reviewed December 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following:- The facility shall act upon concerns and recommendations of the Council, make attempts to accommodate recommendations to the extent practicable, and communicate its decisions to the CouncilReview of the facility's policy titled Complaint/Grievance Policy and Procedure, dated September 2023, indicated… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Feb 11, 2026

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that individualized, comprehensive care plans were developed and consistently implemented for one Resident (#5), out of a total sample of 34 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident specific, individualized care plans were developed to address the medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs of a residents identified with a history of suicidal ideation/attempt/gestures. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, last revised May 2025, indicated but was not limited to:-It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and… […]

Read 30 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 30 of 120 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 11, 2026Standard9 findings
  • Dec 2, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 15, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Nov 20, 2023Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 3, 2023Standard13 findings
  • Sep 14, 2021Complaint4 findings
  • Jun 3, 2021Standard16 findings
  • Jan 21, 2021Infection control2 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
  • Jul 6, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 22, 2019Standard18 findings
  • Jul 2, 2019Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Aug 14, 2018Standard8 findings
  • Jun 22, 2017Complaint4 findings
  • Apr 3, 2017Standard and complaint7 findings · 2 harm
  • Feb 11, 2017Complaint4 findings · 2 harm
  • Dec 13, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 14, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 6, 2013—11 findings · 3 harm
  • Jun 8, 2011—1 finding
  • Mar 28, 2011—1 finding
  • Mar 9, 2011—1 finding
  • Feb 17, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction