Care One at Millbury
Millbury, Massachusetts · CCN 225720
17 surveys since 2014. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 61
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 9
- Immediate jeopardy
- 2
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 154
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- CAREONE
- County
- Worcester
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 1
- Health inspection
- 1
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 96 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Massachusetts.
Last survey on record
May 14, 2026
179 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.64 | 3.59 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.53 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.7% | 34.0% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $95,328 across 3 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G513.5% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2875.7% | E410.8% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F5782×
Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F6772×
Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
- F8802×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5611×
Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Care One at Millbury, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF656Feb 1, 2022
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had stage IV [CONDITION(S)] and dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing food or liquids), per Physician's Orders was NPO (nothing by mouth), and required enteral feedings via a tube feeding (delivery of nutrition directly to the stomach) to maintain his/her nutritional status, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed interventions identified in Resident #1's Comprehensive Plan of Care to maintain NPO status per Physician Orders. […]
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 1, 2022
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had stage IV [CONDITION(S)] with dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing food or liquids), per Physician's Orders was NPO (nothing by mouth), and required enteral feedings (a way of delivering nutrition directly to the stomach) to maintain his/her nutritional status, the Facility failed to ensure services provided by staff were appropriate, that his/her safety was adequately maintained in an effort to to prevent an incident resulting in serious harm and death. On [DATE], Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, who was unfamiliar with Resident #1, and had not provided care to him/her prior to this date, responded to his/her call light, and when Resident #1 asked her for a cookie, she gave him/her one. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 19, 2025
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) remained free from accident hazards during transfers, resulting in Actual Harm. Specifically, for Resident #1, who was assessed as being at high risk for falls and requiring a two-person stand aid for safe transfer, two Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) attempted a manual transfer after the resident reportedly refused the stand aid, gait belt, and Hoyer lift. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF580Apr 25, 2025
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews for two Residents (#94 and #38) out of a total sample of 29 residents, the facility failed to notify the Physician/Nurse Practitioner (NP) of the need to significantly alter treatment (need to discontinue an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences, or to commence a new form of treatment). Specifically, 1. For Resident #94, the facility failed to notify the Physician/NP of the Resident's uncontrolled pain during indwelling urinary catheter care and 34 missed doses of Lidocaine (pain medication) Gel, out of 46 ordered doses, to be applied topically for the Resident's genital pain resulting in ineffective pain management. 2. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF697Apr 25, 2025
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that effective pain management that was consistent with professional standards of practice and the Resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan was provided for one Resident (#94) out of a total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, for Resident #94, the facility failed to: -adequately assess the Resident's pain during personal care of an indwelling urinary catheter when facility staff were aware the Resident had a genital wound and experienced pain during urinary catheter care, resulting in the Resident experiencing pain during indwelling urinary catheter related procedures. […]
Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 61 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 14, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 17, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Nov 19, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 25, 2025Standard15 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 3, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 2, 2024Standard8 findings
- Aug 16, 2022Standard10 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 1, 2022Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Sep 3, 2020Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Aug 4, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Dec 31, 2019Standard6 findings
- Sep 28, 2018Standard2 findings
- Feb 23, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Jun 20, 2017Standard4 findings
- Mar 30, 2015Standard2 findings
- Jul 3, 2014Complaint1 finding
- Feb 12, 2014Standard3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Garden Place HealthcareAttleboro2 harm findings
- Royal Braintree Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterBraintreeno harm findings
- Center For Extended Care at AmherstAmherst5 harm findings
- Southbridge Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterSouthbridge2 harm findings
- Meadows of Central Massachusetts (The)Rochdale4 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction