Rosewood Post Acute
Pleasant Hill, California · CCN 056476
41 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 136
- Surveys
- 41
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 113
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- WINDSOR
- County
- Contra Costa
- Medicare-certified since
- 1977
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 110 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Jun 17, 2026
145 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 4.52 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.09 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 35.3% | 37.6% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1760.7% | E725.0% | F27.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B27.1% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8123×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5842×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6882×
Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Rosewood Post Acute, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 9, 2022
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately supervise one of three totally dependent (the resident needs the staff to completely and totally perform the task) on staff residents (Resident 1) after transferring her back to bed. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 2 and CNA 3) left her in bed, unattended, and unsupervised resulting in an avoidable fall out of bed. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a right leg fracture (broken bone), pain, and a transfer to Acute Care Hospital (ACH 1) for follow up care. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1 ' s Admission Record dated 11/14/22, the record showed Resident 1was admitted to the facility in 08/15/2015. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838May 15, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment (an assessment of the resources and staffing that the facility needs to competently care for the specific patient population) was complete when the following required components were not included. 1. Staffing plan 2. Staff training/education and competencies This failure had the potential to negatively affect a vulnerable population.Findings: 1. During a record review of the facility assessment dated 3/23/26, there was no documented evidence that the facility assessment included the following required component: a. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 28, 2023
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dietary staff stored and prepared food under sanitary conditions for 89 of 97 residents whose food were prepared in the kitchen. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for foodborne illnesses (refers to illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages). Findings: During an initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) on [DATE] at 9:40 A.M., the following were observed: - A jar of Kikkoman soy sauce had a use by date of [DATE]. - A 4.5lb container of sweet and sour sauce did not have an open date and a use by date. - A one-gallon jar of mayonnaise had no open date and use by date. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Aug 4, 2026
Based observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were followed for five of six sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) when:1. Two soiled dressings were observed on Resident 1 and Resident 2's nightstands during two separate occasions.2. One licensed nursing staff member failed to clean and disinfect the glucometer (a handheld device used to measure a person's blood sugar level) after using it for Resident 3 and subsequently used the same contaminated device for Residents 4 and 5 without sanitizing it.These failures had the potential to increase the risk of bacterial transmission, expose residents to cross-contamination (germs are accidentally transferred from one person, object, or surface to another person… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812May 15, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure cold drinks were held at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below during lunch tray line.This failure had the potential to result in the growth of bacteria, placing the residents at risk for contracting a food borne illness.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/13/26 at 11:53 a.m. with the Registered Dietitian (RD), RD stated that the temperature checks were going to be performed and logged. The cold drinks were taken out of the refrigerator, placed on a cart in a plastic tub of ice, and placed next to the tray line to be placed on the meal trays. The juice temperature was registered at 45 degrees Fahrenheit (F) (unit of temperature), and the milk temperature was registered at 43 degrees F. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 136 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 17, 2026Complaint1 finding
- May 28, 2026Complaint2 findings
- May 15, 2026Standard3 findings
- Mar 2, 2026Complaint2 findings
- Feb 17, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 5, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Dec 19, 2025Complaint1 finding
Show the 33 earlier surveys
- Aug 22, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 20, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 28, 2025Standard7 findings
- Aug 9, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jul 24, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Sep 28, 2023Standard5 findings
- May 17, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Dec 9, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Apr 27, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Mar 12, 2020Standard13 findings
- Feb 1, 2019Standard12 findings
- Apr 30, 2018Complaint2 findings
- Feb 26, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Feb 8, 2018Standard4 findings
- Aug 24, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Feb 17, 2017Standard and complaint12 findings
- Apr 28, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Feb 25, 2016Standard5 findings
- Jan 14, 2016Complaint2 findings
- Dec 15, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Apr 22, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Mar 6, 2015Complaint1 finding
- Dec 11, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jan 31, 2014—2 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 22, 2014—1 finding
- Sep 27, 2013—7 findings
- Feb 1, 2013—1 finding
- Jan 25, 2013—1 finding
- Dec 27, 2012Complaint1 finding
- Oct 16, 2012—1 finding
- Aug 30, 2012—6 findings
- Mar 1, 2012—1 finding
- May 27, 2011—16 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction