Deficiency Index

Rose Haven Retreat

Atlanta, Texas · CCN 675603

34 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
131
Surveys
34
Harm or worse
15
Immediate jeopardyall corrected before survey
7
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy7

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. All were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file25/34

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
108
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
CARING HEALTHCARE GROUP
County
Cass · rural
Medicare-certified since
1996

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Jun 17, 2026

145 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.533.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.48—
Annual nurse turnover62.3%54.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,281 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.6%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2668.4%E718.4%F410.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 38 of the 131 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6413×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6452×

    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Rose Haven Retreat, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 25, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as possible, and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accident hazards and supervision. The facility failed to prevent Resident #1 from eloping (leaving the facility property) from the secured unit on 02/10/25. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 02/10/25 and ended on 02/10/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place the residents at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 7, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items were not stored on the floor of the dry pantry. 2. The facility failed to ensure food items in the dry pantry were labeled and dated. 3. The facility failed to ensure plastic bags of what appeared to be hamburger patties, chicken tender strips, sausage patties, onions/green/red peppers, and French fries were labeled and dated in the large freezer. 4. The facility failed to ensure a plastic bag containing an unknown meat was labeled and dated in the white freezer. 5. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 17, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements. 1. The facility failed to ensure an opened bag of potato chips was securely closed or stored in a secure container. 2. The facility failed to ensure the tin pan with stuffed green peppers in beef sauce was securely closed in the freezer. 3. The facility failed to ensure two measuring cups were stored with the top openings facing down. 4. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 17, 2023

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food according with professional standards for food service safety. Dietary staff failed to ensure food was at a safe temperature prior to serving food to residents. This failure could place the census of 47 residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: During an observation on 12/16/23 at 11:05 a.m., food trays had been delivered to residents. Review of a cooking temperature log dated 12/16/23 showed the temperature of the food from the breakfast meal and lunch meal had not been entered. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF925Jul 18, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests in one Secure Unit, one kitchen, 3 of 27 resident's rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) , and 2 of 4 hallways (Hall 100 and 400). The facility failed to treat the roaches in Hall 1 and Hall 4. The facility failed to treat the roaches in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The facility failed to treat the roaches in the Secured Unit. The facility failed to treat the roaches in the kitchen. This failure could place residents at risk for the potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: During an interview on 7/14/23 at 12:57 p.m., Resident #1 she said she had not seen roaches lately. […]

Read 34 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 34 of 131 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 17, 2026Standard5 findings
  • May 11, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 7, 2025Standard9 findings
  • Feb 25, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 17, 2024Standard10 findings
  • Dec 17, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 31, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 18, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 26 earlier surveys
  • Apr 17, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 15, 2023Standard and complaint9 findings
  • Feb 2, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Nov 15, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 5, 2020Standard15 findings · 2 harm
  • Sep 30, 2020Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
  • Sep 19, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 16, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • May 16, 2019Standard and complaint7 findings · 3 harm
  • Apr 23, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 29, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 28, 2017Standard and complaint8 findings · 2 harm
  • May 10, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 3, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 26, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 22, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Apr 18, 2016Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jul 29, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jun 18, 2015Standard4 findings
  • Apr 2, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Apr 17, 2013—12 findings
  • Nov 27, 2012—3 findings
  • Jun 13, 2012—11 findings
  • Sep 7, 2011—4 findings
  • Jun 8, 2011—5 findings
  • May 9, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction