Deficiency Index

Avir at Richland Hills

Richland Hills, Texas · CCN 675840

33 surveys since 2010, 8 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
72
Surveys
33
Harm or worse
8
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file23/33

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
114
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
AVIR HEALTH GROUP
County
Tarrant
Medicare-certified since
2000

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Jun 11, 2026

151 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.533.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.24—
Annual nurse turnover30.9%54.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$14,506 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ13.4%K—L—
Actual harmG13.4%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2069.0%E517.2%F26.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 29 of the 72 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6893×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F7613×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F9193×

    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Avir at Richland Hills, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jul 26, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for one of seven residents (Resident #1) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was adequately supervised in order to prevent her from eloping from the facility. Resident #1 first eloped from the facility on 12/19/23. As a result of the elopement, she was placed on the secured unit at the facility. However, the facility continued to fail to provide adequate supervision and Resident #1 eloped from the facility for the second time on 05/04/24. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 07/24/24 at 4:19PM. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF584Aug 8, 2025

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment, for daily living for three (Resident#1 room, Resident#2 room and Resident# 3 room) of sixteen resident rooms reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility failed to maintain Resident#1, Resident#2 and Resident#3 room at temperatures levels ranging of 71 F to 81 F. This failure could put residents at potential risk associated with temperature extremes, like hypothermia or overheating.Findings included: Resident #1Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated [DATE] revealed, he was a [AGE] year-old male, initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included but were not limited to: Parkinson's disease without Dyskinesia (the condition… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 10, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure food was properly stored in the facility's kitchen. The facility failed to ensure food on the steam table reached the appropriate temperature before plating food for resident consumption. This failure could place residents at risk for food-borne illness. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 16, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure a beef roast maintained a temperature of below 41 degrees Fahrenheit while thawing in a sink of standing water. 2. The facility failed to ensure food items and clean dishes were kept away from airborne contaminants and chemicals. 3. The facility failed to ensure the bottom of both freezers were free of debris and sanitary. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF919Jun 11, 2026

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to adequately equip residents the ability to call for staff assistance through a communication system, which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area, from the bedroom of 3 of (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) 7 resident rooms reviewed for resident call systems. The facility failed to ensure the call light in the room and bathroom were operable for Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to have a means of directly contacting caregivers which could place them at risk for injuries and unmet needs. […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 72 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 11, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 3, 2026Complaint5 findings
  • Dec 5, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Dec 1, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 8, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 22, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 10, 2024Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Jul 26, 2024Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
Show the 25 earlier surveys
  • Jul 28, 2023Standard4 findings
  • Dec 21, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 2, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 11, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 19, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 16, 2022Standard4 findings
  • May 19, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 17, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 18, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 25, 2021Standard and complaint1 finding
  • Mar 11, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 30, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 5, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 28, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Apr 12, 2018Standard2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 2, 2016Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Jun 24, 2016Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Mar 8, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 25, 2015Standard2 findings
  • Jun 4, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Jun 6, 2013—1 finding
  • Jun 7, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 23, 2011—2 findings
  • Sep 9, 2010—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction