Deficiency Index

New Hope Manor

Cedar Park, Texas · CCN 675943

18 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
54
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records. 2 of these were recorded as past non-compliance — corrected before the survey.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
114
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
CARING HEALTHCARE GROUP
County
Williamson
Medicare-certified since
2003

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Mar 18, 2026

236 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.313.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.33—
Annual nurse turnover41.3%54.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$21,648 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ314.3%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1152.4%E628.6%F14.8%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 21 of the 54 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6442×

    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6932×

    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at New Hope Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF580Oct 14, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there is a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status or a need to alter treatment significantly for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility failed to notify the NP in a timely manner when Resident #1 voiced pain to her left knee, swelling, and heat to the touch was observed by LVN B. LVN B noted swelling and warm to touch on Resident #1's knee at approximately 4:00 PM. LVN B noted they contacted the NP when Resident #1's family was present at approximately 10:00 PM. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 14, 2024

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for change in condition. LVN A did not ensure Resident #1, who had a history of a left hip fracture, had a footrest on her wheelchair before transferring her, resulting in a fractured left patella (kneecap). The noncompliance was identified as PNC IJ. The IJ began on 09/04/24 and ended on 09/21/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving adequate assistance devices, accidents during transfers, harm, sustaining injuries, and hospitalization . […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF697Jan 25, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to a resident who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for pain, in that: The facility failed to provide effective pain management for Resident #1 while on hospice services and comfort measures in place. He was found by his Hospice Nurse on 12/24/23 writhing in pain, thrashing, grimacing, and mouthing help me. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 01/24/24 at 5:01 PM. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 14, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide B, Dietary Aide C, and Dietary Cook D properly sanitized her hands between tasks. These failures could place residents who were served from the kitchen at risk for health complications, foodborne illnesses, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Observation on 12/12/2023 beginning at 7:40 AM revealed Dietary Aide B was not wearing gloves. She touched her shirt, picked up her personal cell phone, and touched disinfectant wet cloth to wipe the food prep table. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF803Mar 18, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu for 7 of 30 residents reviewed (Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #26, Resident #29, Resident #54, Resident #66) for diet orders. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff served ground meat on 3/16/2026 for residents on a mechanical soft diet. This failure could place residents on mechanical soft diets at risk of choking and not receiving adequate nutrition.Findings included: Record review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 3/18/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #11's MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 3, which indicated severely impaired cognition. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 54 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 18, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Dec 10, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 13, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 29, 2025Standard7 findings
  • Oct 14, 2024Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jan 25, 2024Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 14, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Feb 18, 2023Complaint1 finding
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Oct 13, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Dec 18, 2020Infection control2 findings
  • Apr 3, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Apr 25, 2018Standard2 findings
  • May 26, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Apr 23, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Aug 6, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 30, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Jun 27, 2013—6 findings
  • Mar 11, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction