Deficiency Index

Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLC

Fort Worth, Texas · CCN 675034

31 surveys since 2011, 12 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
91
Surveys
31
Harm or worse
12
Immediate jeopardy
8
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy8

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/31

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
123
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT
County
Tarrant
Medicare-certified since
1992

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 377 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Texas.

Last survey on record

Jul 8, 2026

124 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.113.25
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.62—
Annual nurse turnover52.7%54.0%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$14,676 across 2 penalties
Payment denials
1
Abuse icon
Flagged by CMS on Care Compare

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ12.9%K—L—
Actual harmG25.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1955.9%E1235.3%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 34 of the 91 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8423×

    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

  • F9253×

    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Apr 15, 2025

    43791 Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from accidents/hazards on 03/16/25 when she was shocked after plugging in her phone charger to the wall socket, that resulted in burns to her fingers and hand. An IJ was identified on 04/14/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:03 PM. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Jul 25, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure residents were free resident-to-resident abuse when Resident #33 entered Resident #21's room, and Resident #21 pushed Resident #33 down. Resident #33 sustained abrasions on his nose and right knee. The failure placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings included:Record review of Resident #33's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #33 was a [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF744Jul 25, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who displays or was diagnosed with dementia, receives the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for dementia services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33 was provided with treatment and services to address his wandering behaviors related to his diagnosis of dementia which resulted in the resident entering Resident #21's room and being pushed by Resident #1. Upon being pushed, Resident #33's face/head bumped Resident #21's dresser, and Resident #33 sustained abrasions on his nose and right knee. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF925May 19, 2026

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 1 of 1 kitchen to keep it free of flies. The facility failed to ensure the kitchen was free of flies on 05/19/26. This failure could affect residents who eat from the kitchen placing them at risk for the potential spread of infection and decreased quality of life.Findings included: Observation on 05/19/26 at 10:45 AM of the facility's kitchen revealed there were 7 flies, 5 of the flies were on a cord of the food processor that was plugged into the outlet, 1 fly was on the outlet, and another fly was observed on the leg of the prep table while 3 staff members prepared lunch. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF567Sep 8, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to act as a fiduciary of the residents' funds and hold, safeguard, manage and account for the personal funds of the resident deposited with the facility for nine (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9) of nine residents reviewed for resident trust accounts. The facility did not monitor resident trust fund account balances to ensure funds did not exceed Medicaid resource limits. The facility allowed Residents #1, # 2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8 and #9 trust funds to remain over $3,000, which placed them at risk of losing their Medicaid eligibility. […]

Read 28 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 28 of 91 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 8, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • May 19, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 25, 2025Standard and complaint5 findings · 2 harm
  • May 24, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 15, 2025Complaint5 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 15, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 25, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 23 earlier surveys
  • Jun 3, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 9, 2024Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Jan 3, 2024Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 9, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 6, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Jan 25, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 14, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 25, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Jun 4, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 21, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Dec 21, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Nov 10, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Apr 26, 2017Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Nov 1, 2016Complaint4 findings · 4 harm
  • Sep 28, 2016Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Sep 25, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Oct 2, 2014Standard7 findings
  • Oct 31, 2013—2 findings
  • Oct 8, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 5, 2012—3 findings
  • Mar 8, 2012—1 finding
  • Oct 6, 2011—3 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 20, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction