Deficiency Index

Redmont Health and Rehabilitation Center

Birmingham, Alabama · CCN 015303

15 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
87
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2022
’11’15’20’22
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file12/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
163
Ownership
For profit - Individual
Chain
ARABELLA HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT
County
Jefferson
Medicare-certified since
1973

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Oct 27, 2022

1,474 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.483.81
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.67—
Annual nurse turnover59.6%47.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1280.0%E16.7%F16.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C16.7%
CMS’s current file: 15 of the 87 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5822×

    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.

  • F5842×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6411×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6451×

    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Redmont Health and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF582Oct 27, 2022

    Based on record review, interview and a facility policy titled Medicare Advanced Beneficiary Notice, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) # 13, RI #22, and RI #125 were issued a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) (CMS ). This affected three of three Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notices reviewed. Findings Include: A review of a facility policy titled Medicare Advanced Beneficiary Notice, dated April 2021 documented: .2. If the resident's Medicare Part A benefits are terminating for coverage reasons, the director of admissions or benefits coordinator issues the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (CMS form ) to the resident at least two calendar days before Medicare covered services end . RI # 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Oct 27, 2022

    Based on interview, record reviews, and review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User ' s Manual, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #23's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] and RI #32's Annual MDS dated [DATE] were accurately coded to reflect RI #23's, and RI #32's active/current diagnoses. This affected two of 19 sampled residents for whom MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings Include: A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, dated October 2019, revealed: . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF645Oct 27, 2022

    Based on interview, record review and review of a facility policy ADMISSION CRITERIA, the facility failed to ensure a Level II evaluation for Resident Identifier (RI) #58 was completed as indicated when the Level I screening determined a Level II was necessary. This affected Resident Identifier (RI) #58 one of two residents sampled for Pre-Admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). Findings Include: A review of a facility policy with a revised date of December 2016 titled ADMISSION CRITERIA revealed . Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 8. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656Oct 27, 2022

    Based on Record review, interview and a facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for Resident Identifier (RI) #1 when he/she was prescribed an anticoagulation medication. This affected one of two residents sampled for the use of anticoagulation (AC) medication. Findings Include: A review of a policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered with a revised date of December 2016 documented: . […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 87 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Oct 27, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Dec 12, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Aug 16, 2019Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 1, 2018Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Apr 13, 2018Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 5, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Nov 3, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Jan 29, 2016Standard14 findings
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • Jan 23, 2015Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 4, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Nov 15, 2013—7 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 4, 2013—2 findings
  • Oct 26, 2012—10 findings
  • Jan 26, 2012—6 findings
  • Jan 27, 2011—7 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction