Mitchell-Hollingsworth Nursing & Rehabilitation
Florence, Alabama · CCN 015031
11 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 37
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 4
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 222
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PRESTON HEALTH SERVICES
- County
- Lauderdale
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Sep 18, 2025
417 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.38 | 3.81 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.69 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 36.6% | 47.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1090.9% | E— | F19.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Mitchell-Hollingsworth Nursing & Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF600Sep 18, 2025
Based on record review, interviews, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one of six residents (Resident (R) 137) reviewed for abuse, was free from abuse of 38 sample residents. This failure had the potential to affect resident safety. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated [DATE], recorded It is the policy of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property.1.Review of R137's undated admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, indicated R137 was initially… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF605Sep 18, 2025
Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident (R) 7) reviewed for unnecessary medications had an appropriate diagnosis for the use of an atypical antipsychotic medication with dementia of 38 sample residents. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medications, reviewed 04/22/25, revealed: Policy: It is the intent of this policy to ensure that residents only receive psychotropic medications when other nonpharmacological interventions are clinically contraindicated. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF628Sep 18, 2025
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of three residents (Resident (R) 3 and R12) Resident Representative (RR) or Family Member (FM) reviewed for facility initiated emergent transfer to the hospital received a written notice of transfer and/or a written bed hold notice from a sample of 38 residents. This failure had the potential to affect the resident and their Resident Representative by not having the knowledge of where and why a resident was transferred and/or how to appeal the transfer, if desired, and contribute to the possibility of denial of re-admission and loss of the resident's home following a hospitalization for residents transferred to the hospital. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Sep 18, 2025
Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, facility failed to conduct a thorough falls root cause analysis for two of eight residents (Residents(R) 137 and R3) reviewed for falls of 38 sample residents. This failure could result in the facility's inability to discover the reason behind the resident's fall and put the appropriate interventions in place based on the reason for the fall.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Prevention Program, dated 11/20/24, recorded When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will: a. Assess the resident. b. Complete a post-fall assessment. c. Complete an incident report. d. Notify physician and family. e. Review the residents' care plan and update as indicated. f. Document all assessments and actions. g. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF700Sep 18, 2025
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure alternatives were attempted prior to the use of side rails for two of two residents (Resident (R) 7 and R12) reviewed for side rails out of 38 sample residents. This failure had the potential to increase accidental entrapment or injury from bed rail usage when an alternate assistive device may have been effective.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Proper Use of Bed Rails, reviewed 07/07/25, revealed: It is the policy of this facility to utilize a person-centered approach when determining the use of bed rails. Appropriate alternative approaches are attempted prior to installing or using bed rails.Resident Assessment: .2. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 37 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Sep 18, 2025Standard and complaint6 findings
- Sep 5, 2019Standard1 finding
- Aug 2, 2018Standard4 findings
- Nov 17, 2017Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jun 15, 2017Standard1 finding
- May 12, 2016Standard3 findings
- Apr 4, 2015Standard and complaint12 findings · 3 harm
- May 8, 2014Standard2 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Mar 7, 2013—2 findings
- Jan 6, 2012—3 findings
- Nov 11, 2010—2 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction