Puxico Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Puxico, Missouri · CCN 265496
17 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 79
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 60
- Ownership
- For profit - Individual
- Chain
- CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES
- County
- Stoddard · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1992
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=16, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Nov 17, 2025
357 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.92 | 3.20 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.64 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 50.0% | 57.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1168.8% | E318.8% | F212.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6982×
Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F5841×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6361×
Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
- F6371×
Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Puxico Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 17, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 40.Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Preparation and Service, dated November 2022, showed: - Danger zone means temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit ( F) and below 135 F that allow the rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness;- The longer potentially hazardous foods (PHF) remain in the danger zone, the greater the risk for growth of harmful pathogens, and must be maintained at or below 41 F or at or above 135 F;- Raw foods cooked in a microwave reach 165 F in all parts of the… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 31, 2023
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. These practices had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 36. Record review of the facility's Food Preparation and Service policy, dated 11/2022, showed: - Food and nutrition service employees prepare, distribute and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices; - When meals are assembled in the kitchen and then delivered to residents' rooms or dining areas to be distributed, covering foods is appropriate, either individually or in a mobile food cart; - When actively serving residents in a dining room or outside a resident's room where trained staff are… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Nov 17, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement proper infection control practices when staff performed incontinent care for three residents (Residents #3, #14, and #35) out of three sampled residents, catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care for two residents (Residents #3 and #35) out of two sampled residents, wound care for two residents (Residents #3 and #12) out of two sampled residents, and during glucose monitoring and insulin administration for four residents (Residents #5, #26, #28, and #36) out of four sampled residents. The facility also failed to ensure the laundry building remained in good condition to promote infection control. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF636Mar 31, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility staff) assessments within the required time frames for one resident (Resident #18) out of 12 sampled residents and five residents (Resident #131, #132, #133, #181, and #184) outside of the sample. The facility census was 36. Record review of the facility's Resident Assessments policy, revised March 2022, showed: - The resident assessment coordinator is responsible for ensuring the appropriate resident assessments and reviews are completed; - The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) (the manual used to help staff gather definitive information on the resident's strengths and needs which must be addressed in the MDS and care… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF638Mar 31, 2023
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff, within the required timeframe for two residents (Resident #16 and #23) of 12 sampled residents and 15 residents (Resident #1, #8, #11, #17, #22, #81, #82, #83, #84, #85, #86, #133, #181, #184, and #185 ) outside the sampled residents. The facility's census was 36. Record review of the facility's Resident Assessments policy, Revised March 2022, showed: - The resident assessment coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the appropriate resident assessments and reviews are completed; - The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) (the manual used to help staff gather definitive information on the resident's… […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 79 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Nov 17, 2025Standard3 findings
- Jul 24, 2024Standard6 findings
- Mar 31, 2023Standard7 findings
- Oct 19, 2020Standard9 findings
- Aug 7, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Feb 20, 2019Standard11 findings
- Apr 20, 2018Standard2 findings
- Feb 15, 2017Standard4 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Sep 19, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Jun 23, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Apr 8, 2016Standard3 findings
- Feb 4, 2015Standard5 findings
- Dec 31, 2013—7 findings
- Apr 25, 2013—1 finding
- Feb 20, 2013—6 findings
- Apr 11, 2012—2 findings
- Feb 11, 2011—10 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction