PruittHealth-Farmville
Farmville, North Carolina · CCN 345384
17 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2022.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 78
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 56
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PRUITTHEALTH
- County
- Pitt
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded more weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 39 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in North Carolina.
Last survey on record
Aug 7, 2025
459 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.36 | 3.57 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.73 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 49.0% | 45.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $14,697 across 2 penalties
- Payment denials
- 1
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G15.0% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1155.0% | E315.0% | F420.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C15.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
- F5541×
Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
- F6021×
Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
- F6261×
Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at PruittHealth-Farmville, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF600Jan 27, 2022
Based on record review, staff and Physician interview, the facility neglected to protect a resident (Resident #5) who was severely cognitively impaired from sexual abuse from another resident (Resident #11) who was moderately cognitively impaired. The facility also failed to immediately intervene to protect Resident #5 when the sexual abuse was first observed. This occurred for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. On 10-30-21 Resident #11 was observed in Resident #5's room by Nursing Assistant (NA) #1 kissing Resident #5 with his hand down Resident #5's brief and again on 12-30-21 Resident #11 was observed by Nurse #1 in Resident #5's room touching Resident #5's breasts. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689May 22, 2025
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide effective supervision to prevent avoidable falls for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for high risk of falls (Resident #1 and Resident #2). Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident, sustained a collarbone fracture and a hematoma (a solid swelling of clotted blood within the tissues) on the left side of the forehead from a fall that occurred after staff monitoring her fell asleep (Nurse Aide #1) and ignored her attempt to stand (Nurse #1). Findings included: 1. Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had multiple diagnoses, some of which included intellectual disabilities, dementia, and age-related osteoporosis. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867May 11, 2023
Based on observations, record review and resident and staff interviews the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions that the committee put into place following the 2/23/21 focused infection control and complaint investigation survey, the 1/27/22 recertification and complaint investigation survey and the 11/30/22 complaint investigation survey. This was for one deficiency in the area of F880 Infection Prevention and Control that was cited on the 2/23/21 focused infection control and complaint investigation survey, 2 deficiencies in the areas of F656 Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plan and F880 Infection Prevention and Control that were cited on the 1/27/22 recertification and complaint… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880May 11, 2023
Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to implement an infection surveillance plan for monitoring and tracking infections in the facility. This practice had the potential to affect 49 of 49 residents in the facility. Findings included: The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Surveillance policy reviewed on 4-6-23 documented the Infection Preventionist (IP) conducts surveillance of all infections among residents and partners including tracking and analysis of outbreaks of infections. The Infection Preventionist (IP) nurse was interviewed on 5-11-23 at 11:12am. The IP nurse discussed tracking and analyzing infections in the facility by using an approved tracking form. She explained the form was computerized, so she did not have a paper copy for review. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF881May 11, 2023
Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to develop an infection prevention and control program that established an antibiotic stewardship program with written protocols on antibiotic prescribing, documentation of the indication, dosage, and duration of use of antibiotics. This was evident in 3 of 3 monthly surveillance data reviewed (February 2023, March 2023, and April 2023). Findings included: The facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy revised on 2-8-23 documented the antibiotic stewardship program will monitor and review infections and antibiotic usage patterns on a regular basis, antibiogram reports for trends of antibiotic resistance, antibiotic resistance pattern for multidrug resistant organisms, number of antibiotics prescribed, and the number of… […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 78 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 7, 2025Standard4 findings
- May 22, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 20, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Aug 8, 2024Standard and complaint2 findings
- May 11, 2023Standard and complaint11 findings
- Jan 4, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Nov 30, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Oct 26, 2022Complaint3 findings
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Jan 27, 2022Standard and complaint14 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 23, 2021Complaint5 findings
- Aug 16, 2019Standard4 findings
- Aug 3, 2018Standard and complaint8 findings
- Jun 9, 2017Standard7 findings
- Mar 13, 2014Standard and complaint4 findings
- Apr 18, 2013—2 findings
- Mar 1, 2012—3 findings
- Apr 28, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction