Deficiency Index

Premier at the Springs

North Little Rock, Arkansas · CCN 045357

37 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
151
Surveys
37
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
2
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy2

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file32/37

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
132
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
THE SPRINGS ARKANSAS
County
Pulaski
Medicare-certified since
2000

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
1
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 46 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Arkansas.

Last survey on record

Jun 12, 2026

150 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.003.82
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.23—
Annual nurse turnover60.5%49.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD925.7%E2160.0%F38.6%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B12.9%C12.9%
CMS’s current file: 35 of the 151 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5582×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F8032×

    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Premier at the Springs, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Aug 14, 2025

    Based on facility document review, interviews, facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough facility assessment for the staffing required for day/evening/weekend coverage of resident needs and failed to formulate a plan for staff recruitment and retention to meet the needs of the residents when completing their facility assessment. The findings include: A review of the Facility Assessment, dated 07/07/2025, revealed the following: “The Facility Assessment Team” was identified as the Administrator, Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist, and Medical Director. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 8, 2024

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the refrigerator and storage area were covered or sealed to maintain freshness and prevent potential cross contamination of food and beverages; expired food items were promptly removed/discarded by the expiration or use by dates; kitchen vents cleaned; provide a sanitary environment for food preparation; floors, kitchen walls, door frames and baseboards were free of rotten wood, chipped floor tiles, debris, rust, and dirt; 3 of 3 ice machines were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition to prevent food and beverage contamination; and staff washed their hands and changed gloves between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment or food items to minimize the potential for contaminating… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 3, 2023

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the refrigerator/freezer were covered, sealed and dated; ceiling vents and lights were maintained in clean, sanitary conditions for food preparation and to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; expired food items were promptly removed/discarded by the expiration or use by dates; foods were dated when received to ensure first in, first out usage to prevent potential for food bone illness; leftover foods were used to maintain food quality; dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; and failed to ensure 2 of 3 ice machine… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Nov 10, 2021

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen floors, appliances and equipment were maintained in clean condition; pureed food was prepared without the use of leftover food items; and dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The failed practices had the potential to affect 99 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census: 104), as documented on a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 11/8/2021. The findings are: 1. On 11/07/21 at 10:19 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen the following observations were made: a. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Aug 14, 2025

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure personal care was provided for two (Resident #106 and Resident #126) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The findings include: Resident #126 Review of Resident #126’s admission Record indicated Resident #126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation [of toes of left foot], type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic nerve pain, absence of left toes, disorder in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the legs and feet, anxiety disorder and absence of right leg above the knee. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 151 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 12, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 14, 2025Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Dec 4, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 17, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • May 8, 2024Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Mar 3, 2023Standard12 findings
  • Oct 21, 2022Complaint3 findings
  • Aug 10, 2022Complaint5 findings
Show the 29 earlier surveys
  • May 11, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 30, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 11, 2022Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 10, 2021Standard13 findings
  • Apr 15, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 17, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Dec 23, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 21, 2020Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 15, 2020Standard11 findings
  • Feb 5, 2019Standard12 findings
  • Aug 17, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 18, 2018Complaint4 findings · 1 harm
  • Mar 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 2, 2018Standard12 findings
  • Dec 29, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 26, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 3, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 7, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Feb 4, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 17, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Jan 23, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 3, 2014Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Nov 8, 2013—4 findings
  • Jun 28, 2013—3 findings
  • Aug 2, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
  • Nov 9, 2011—1 finding
  • Oct 13, 2011—1 finding
  • Sep 16, 2011—6 findings
  • Jun 28, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction