Preferred Care at Cumberland
Bridgeton, New Jersey · CCN 315396
17 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 71
- Surveys
- 17
- Harm or worse
- 3
- Immediate jeopardy
- 1
Findings at the most serious level CMS records.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 196
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- PREFERRED CARE
- County
- Cumberland
- Medicare-certified since
- 1997
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=19, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jun 15, 2026
147 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.58 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.32 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 57.8% | 41.8% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1588.2% | E— | F15.9% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B15.9% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8422×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F5841×
Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
- F6401×
Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
- F6411×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6551×
Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Preferred Care at Cumberland, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Immediate jeopardy, patternF880Jan 25, 2021
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) implement appropriate infection control practices related to the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in a manner to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 staff members, who provided care to residents on the unit designated for Persons Under Investigation for Covid-19 (PUI), during the Covid-19 survey conducted on 1/25/21. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 7, 2025
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff thoroughly cleaned and air-dried pots and pans prior to storage. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illness and had the potential to affect 128 of 132 residents who received dietary services. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning and Storage of Pots/Pans in Dietary, dated 02/28/25 revealed, Policy: To ensure pots and pans are cleaned, sanitized, and stored in a sanitary manner that prevents contamination and complies with state and federal regulations. Procedure: 1. Cleaning and Drying: Cookware should be properly cleaned and dried after use using available methods approved for kitchen sanitation. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF842Jun 15, 2026
Based on interviews and review of facility documentation on 6/10/26 and 6/15/26, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a resident's medical information confidential in accordance with standards. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 7 residents reviewed (Resident #7), and was evidenced by the following:a.) A review of the admission Record (AR) revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: acute osteomyelitis, type II diabetes, and memory deficit following cerebral infarction. A review of facility documented grievance records revealed a grievance dated 5/13/26 for Resident #1, which was completed by the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) following a phone notification by third party provider. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF640Aug 7, 2025
Based on record review, interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident (R) 13) out of four residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments was transmitted in a timely manner, out of a sample of 32 residents. This had the potential for the resident's progress not to be monitored and potential for decline. Findings include:Review of the RAI manual version 1.191 dated 10/24 revealed . Chapter 2: Assessments for the Resident Assessment Instrument, 2.6: Required OBRA Assessments for the MDS.RAI OBRA-required assessment summary for admission.MDS completion date (Z0500B) no later than 14th calendar day of the resident's admission (admission date + 13 calendar days) .Transmission date no later than care plan… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF655Aug 7, 2025
Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan included sufficient information to provide person-centered care for one of three sampled residents (Resident (R) 161) reviewed for new admission in a total sample of 32 residents. This failure had the potential for the resident to have unmet care needs.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Baseline Care Plan created 01/2025 revealed, .The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 71 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 15, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Aug 7, 2025Standard and complaint5 findings
- Aug 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Feb 23, 2024Standard and complaint9 findings
- Nov 12, 2021Standard2 findings
- Jan 25, 2021Infection control1 finding · 1 harm
- Nov 27, 2019Standard2 findings
- Oct 7, 2019Complaint1 finding
Show the 9 earlier surveys
- Dec 11, 2018Standard2 findings
- Dec 6, 2016Standard2 findings
- Dec 18, 2015Standard and complaint4 findings
- Nov 14, 2013—5 findings
- Mar 13, 2013—1 finding
- Aug 29, 2012—10 findings
- Jan 24, 2012—4 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 21, 2011—1 finding
- Jul 22, 2011—20 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Optima Care HarborviewJersey Cityno harm findings
- Atlantic Coast Rehab & HealthLakewood1 harm finding
- Autumn Lake Healthcare at Memorial BridgePenns Grove1 harm finding
- Arnold Walter Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterHazletno harm findings
- Phoenix Center for Rehabilitation and PediatricsHaskell1 harm finding
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction