Poway Healthcare Center
Poway, California · CCN 555136
49 surveys since 2011, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 130
- Surveys
- 49
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- PACS GROUP
- County
- San Diego
- Medicare-certified since
- 1981
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Aug 28, 2025
438 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.97 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.61 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 42.5% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2982.9% | E617.1% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F8424×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F8803×
Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
- F5572×
Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
- F5582×
Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
- F6582×
Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Poway Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700May 8, 2025
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain consent for the use of bed rails for 2 (Resident #9 and Resident #24) of 3 sampled residents with bed rails installed; and failed to complete assessments for the continued use of bed rails for 3 (Residents #9, #24, and #54) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Bed Safety and Bed Rails, revised 08/2022, revealed, 3. The use of bed rails or side rails (including temporarily raising the side rails for episodic use during care) is prohibited unless the criteria for use of bed rails have been met, including attempts to use alternatives, interdisciplinary evaluation, resident assessment, and informed consent. The policy specified, 8. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880May 8, 2025
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) masks in a manner that limited the spread of infection for 2 (Resident #22 and Resident #47) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: A facility policy titled, CPAP/BiPAP [bilevel positive airway pressure] Support, revised 03/2015, revealed, General Guidelines for Cleaning, that specified, 9. Storage of equipment: Head gear/mask/nasal pillows when not in use will be stored in a bag labeled with date and changed weekly. 1. An Admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #22 on 03/05/2025. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Apr 5, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control practice during a norovirus (a food-borne, highly contagious virus that causes vomiting and diarrhea) outbreak. This failure had the potential to spread the norovirus in the facility. Findings: On 6/25/21, the California Department of Public Health received notification of a norovirus outbreak at the facility. On 6/29/21, an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility. A tour of the facility was conducted on 6/29/21 at 10:05 A.M. to observe for implementation of infection control practices. The tour included observations in the facility's kitchen. A red bucket (a bucket containing disinfectant used on kitchen surfaces where food is prepared) was located on a shelf. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF558Mar 17, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide non-English communication boards (a board in a specific language use to communicate) to non- English speaking residents for one of one sampled resident (Resident 53) and three non-sampled residents (Resident 141, 140, 46) reviewed for communication. This failure had the potential for Residents' 46, 53, 140, and 141, to not have their needs known or met, and for decreased socialization. 1. Resident 141 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . On 3/14/22 at 9 A.M., an observation was conducted inside Resident 141's room. Resident 141 was lying flat in bed with his eyes open, with the lights off, curtain pulled, and no TV or radio on. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF658Mar 17, 2022
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing standards of practice were followed when: 1a. A peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC-a main intravenous line) was not consistently monitored or documented for one of two residents (Resident 11), reviewed for Professional Standards of Practice; 1b. Intravenous (IV) antibiotic medication was not documented as administered via the PICC line for one of two residents (Resident 11), reviewed for Professional Standards of Practice; and 2. […]
Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 130 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Aug 28, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 21, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Aug 7, 2025Complaint1 finding
- May 8, 2025Standard3 findings
- Apr 8, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Oct 16, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Sep 18, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Mar 19, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 41 earlier surveys
- Feb 14, 2024Complaint1 finding
- Dec 15, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jul 31, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 30, 2023Complaint1 finding
- May 3, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Apr 14, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Mar 29, 2023Complaint2 findings
- Sep 13, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Jul 7, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Apr 8, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Apr 5, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Mar 17, 2022Standard10 findings
- Feb 14, 2022Complaint2 findings
- Dec 21, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Aug 31, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Dec 4, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Nov 3, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Mar 23, 2020Complaint3 findings
- Mar 18, 2020Complaint2 findings
- Apr 11, 2019Standard13 findings
- May 24, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Apr 19, 2018Standard2 findings
- Aug 1, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Jan 26, 2017Standard3 findings
- Jan 25, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Feb 11, 2016Standard7 findings
- Jan 26, 2015Standard1 finding
- Jan 15, 2015Complaint4 findings
- Feb 25, 2014—1 finding
- Jan 29, 2014—13 findings
- Jan 8, 2014—1 finding
- Oct 15, 2013—1 finding
- Oct 2, 2013—4 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 23, 2013—2 findings
- Feb 7, 2013—9 findings
- Dec 27, 2012—1 finding · 1 harm
- Sep 20, 2012—1 finding
- Aug 16, 2012—1 finding
- Aug 9, 2012—1 finding
- Mar 22, 2012—7 findings
- Mar 10, 2011—7 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction