Bayberry Skilled Nursing & Healthcare Center
Concord, California · CCN 056260
29 surveys since 2010. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 110
- Surveys
- 29
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 99
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- GENERATIONS HEALTHCARE
- County
- Contra Costa
- Medicare-certified since
- 1976
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 3
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.
Last survey on record
Jul 16, 2026
116 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.79 | 4.16 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.46 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 35.1% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G14.2% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1145.8% | E1041.7% | F28.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F7612×
Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
- F8032×
Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Bayberry Skilled Nursing & Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 8, 2026
Based on observation, interview and record review, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 6) who were reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure two staff were present and bed rails were provided during incontinent care (providing support for individuals who cannot control their bladder or bowels) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 let go of Resident 6, with no bed rail to hold onto. Resident 6 fell out of bed and sustained fracture of the surgical neck of the left humerus with fracture line extension to the greater tuberosity (left shoulder fracture).During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR) dated 1/5/26, the AR indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 with multiple diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 28, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary environment when: 1. Kitchen Floors were not clean and maintained in good condition; 2. Chicken was not thawed safely; 3. The ice machine was not clean and was not cleaned according to manufacturer's instructions; 4. A can opener was not clean; and 5. Cutting boards were not clean and were in poor condition These failures had the potential to result in contamination of food, food preparation equipment, and utensils used for food, leading to food borne illness and/or food related illness for 80 residents who received food from the kitchen out of a census of 80. 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF813Jun 28, 2024
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Family members could bring in food for residents. 2. Residents had a location to safely store perishable food. 3. A policy described the safe storage of food brought in by family members. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness from unsafe food storage, decreased food intake, and did not create a homelike environment for 80 residents who took food by mouth out of a census of 80. Findings: During an interview on 6/24/24 at 11:21 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated that the facility did not have any refrigerators to store resident food in, and perishable foods were thrown away. During an interview on 6/24/24 at 11:25 a.m. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF600Jul 16, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure six of 15 sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 6, Resident 7 and Resident 8) were free from physical abuse when: 1. Resident 1 pushed and punched Resident 2;2. Resident 3 spat on Resident 4, after Resident 4 called Resident 3 a racial slur;3. Resident 5 punched Resident 6 four times;4. Resident 7 and Resident 8 hit each other. This failure had the potential to result in physical, mental and emotional harm for Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 6, Resident 7 and Resident 8. 1. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF641Jan 8, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool to drive resident care plan) for four of seven sampled residents (Resident 42, 49, 52, and 64) when residents' tobacco use was incorrectly coded as No on the MDS despite evidence of tobacco use. This failure resulted in an inaccurate reflection of the residents' smoking status and had the potential to affect the development and implantation of resident-centered care plans.During a review of the admission Records (ARs) for Resident 42, 49, 52, and 64, printed on 1/7/25, the records indicated that these residents were admitted to the facility on [DATE], 12/3/25, 5/16/24, and 11/7/24, respectively.During observations on 1/6/26 and 1/7/26 at… […]
Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 110 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jul 16, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 8, 2026Standard11 findings · 1 harm
- Jun 5, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Jun 28, 2024Standard6 findings
- Nov 22, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 19, 2021Standard5 findings
- Jul 2, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Feb 20, 2020Complaint1 finding
Show the 21 earlier surveys
- Mar 5, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Feb 22, 2019Standard6 findings
- Apr 19, 2018Standard3 findings
- Apr 16, 2018Complaint1 finding
- Nov 3, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Nov 2, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Oct 23, 2017Complaint1 finding
- Aug 30, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Apr 13, 2017Standard11 findings
- Oct 7, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Apr 7, 2016Standard6 findings
- Dec 8, 2015Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 26, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Feb 13, 2015Standard and complaint13 findings · 1 harm
- Feb 27, 2014Standard10 findings
- Jan 22, 2013—1 finding
- Dec 31, 2012—1 finding
- Dec 14, 2012—10 findings
- Oct 16, 2012—1 finding
- Sep 29, 2011—1 finding
- Jul 16, 2010—8 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction