Deficiency Index

La Mesa Healthcare Center

La Mesa, California · CCN 055488

36 surveys since 2010, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
144
Surveys
36
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2010–2026
’10’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file28/36

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
94
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
PACS GROUP
County
San Diego
Medicare-certified since
1970

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 423 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in California.

Last survey on record

Jul 22, 2026

110 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.124.16
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.39—
Annual nurse turnover33.7%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD3788.1%E511.9%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 42 of the 144 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6564×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5542×

    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

  • F6572×

    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.

  • F6862×

    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at La Mesa Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Jul 22, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement individualized, person-centered discharge care plans that reflected each individualized, person-centered discharge for three of five sampled residents (Resident 1, 3 and 4) with the same generic and identical goals and interventions for each resident.These deficient practices placed three residents (Resident 1, 4 and 5) at risk for unmet healthcare needs, poor coordination of care, ineffective discharge planning, interruption in continuity of care, and avoidable health complications after discharge. Cross Reference F627 and F628. Findings:1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF690Mar 27, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to consistently monitor and document urine output (UO) per the facility's policy, for four of six sampled residents (7, 10, 11 and 12) with a urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to aid in urine flow). In addition, there was no urinary catheter care order for Residents 7, and 12. These failures had the potential for residents 7, 10, 11 and 12 to have urinary retention and develop urinary tract infection (UTI). Findings: 1a. Resident 7 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection), per the facility's Admission Record. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Mar 27, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary measures were met in the kitchen during dietary operations, according to standards of practice when: 1. One outdated container of sour cream was not discarded and still stored for use and consumption. 2. Personal clothing items that belonged to staff were hanging on the food container carts. These failures had the potential to expose residents to unsafe and unsanitary food practices that could lead to widespread foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. On 3/24/25 at 8:19 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). One container of sour cream was labeled with a use by date (when food should be consumed) of 3/22/25. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Dec 2, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control policies were followed when: 1. Oxygen tubing was not changed weekly for three of three residents reviewed for oxygen therapy (17, 52, and 53), 2. A Licensed Nurse (LN) did not perform hand hygiene between glove changes and did not ensure scissors were clean and sanitized before use during a dressing change for one sampled resident (21). These deficient practices had the potential for cross-contamination, and placed the residents, staff, and visitors at risk for facility acquired infections. Findings: 1a. On 11/29/21 at 10:42 A.M., an observation was conducted with Resident 53. Resident 53 was on the bed and actively receiving oxygen therapy. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF627Jul 22, 2026

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare a safe and coordinated discharge for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) by not providing necessary equipment for a continuous tube feeding(TF-way to give liquid food, water, and medicine directly into the stomach or small intestine through a soft plastic tube when a person cannot safely chew or swallow) order and/or necessary teaching to administer a bolus (a way to give liquid food or formula through a feeding tube like a meal, using a large syringe several times a day) feeding as revised due to no feeding pump (machine used to deliver tube feedings).These deficient practices placed Resident 1 at risk for missed needed nutrition, delayed feeding, poor nutritional status, dehydration, re-hospitalization, and… […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 144 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 22, 2026Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 15, 2026Standard6 findings
  • May 6, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 29, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 4, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 27, 2025Standard10 findings
  • Oct 12, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 5, 2023Complaint2 findings
Show the 28 earlier surveys
  • Jan 17, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 8, 2022Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 2, 2021Standard5 findings
  • Nov 9, 2021Complaint3 findings
  • Oct 26, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 21, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • May 26, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 15, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 13, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 8, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 16, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • May 9, 2019Standard18 findings
  • May 8, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 7, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 4, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Feb 2, 2017Standard10 findings
  • Aug 9, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 5, 2016Standard15 findings
  • Dec 17, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 8, 2014Standard10 findings
  • May 16, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Feb 11, 2014—3 findings
  • Dec 19, 2013—6 findings
  • Oct 2, 2013—1 finding
  • Sep 24, 2013—1 finding
  • May 9, 2013—2 findings
  • Dec 14, 2011—11 findings
  • Dec 9, 2010—11 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction