Deficiency Index

Ozark Health and Rehabilitation, LLC

Ozark, Alabama · CCN 015208

12 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
26
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2023
’11’15’20’23
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
149
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
NHS MANAGEMENT
County
Dale · rural
Medicare-certified since
1978

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
4
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jun 16, 2023

1,242 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.743.81
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.37—
Annual nurse turnover46.3%47.7%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD480.0%E—F120.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 26 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Ozark Health and Rehabilitation, LLC, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF604Jun 16, 2023

    Based on observation, record review, interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure that side were not used in a manner to physically restrain Resident #107. This affected one of one sampled residents reviewed for side rail use as a restraint. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Bedrail Use, effective 10/26/2022, revealed, PURPOSE: Bedrails are used to enable a resident/guest to become more functionally independent, and when the medical condition of the resident/guest requires the use of a bedrail. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF657Jun 16, 2023

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive person-centered care plan for (Resident #107). Specifically, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan for Resident #107 to include the use of siderails as an enabler for bed mobility and transfers. This affected one of 26 sampled residents comprehensive care plans reviewed. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Bedrail Use, effective on 01/01/2019, revealed: . PURPOSE of bedrails was to enable a resident/guest to become more functionally independent, and when the medical condition of the resident requires the use of a bedrail. The policy indicated . […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677Jun 16, 2023

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required extensive to total assistance with personal hygiene were regularly offered trimming or shaving of facial hair and trimming of fingernails to maintain good grooming and hygiene. This affected two of five sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) for (Resident #65 and Resident #107). Findings included: Review of a facility policy, titled, Nail Care, with an effective date of 10/01/2010, revealed, PURPOSE: Routine nail care helps reduce the potential for infection, prevents intrusion of the nail into the skin, prevents possible injuries and promotes a feeling of well being for the resident. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF584Jun 2, 2022

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure: 1. the residents' shower room on the [NAME] Hall did not have one-half of the paint peeled off and missing from the ceiling. 2. Resident Identifier (RI) # 1 and 8's bathroom door jambs were not rotten or disintegrating from the floor, five to six inches up the door jambs. This had the potential to affect 24 residents who used the shower room on [NAME] Hall, and two of eight sampled residents' bathroom door jamb. Findings Include: On 6/1/22 at 11:20 AM RI #1 reported that the wall beside the door to bathroom was rotted out about six to eight inches from floor. RI #1 said he/she told Employee Identifier (EI) #3, Maintenance Director over a year ago and he started working on it and never finished. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 26 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 16, 2023Standard3 findings
  • Jun 2, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 29, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 13, 2019Standard2 findings
  • Jul 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 18, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Apr 14, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Mar 5, 2015Standard3 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Aug 6, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Jun 20, 2013—3 findings
  • May 24, 2012—1 finding
  • Apr 7, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction