Hatley Health Care Inc
Clanton, Alabama · CCN 015023
11 surveys since 2011, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 45
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 201
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Chilton
- Medicare-certified since
- 1967
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 3
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=6, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jun 15, 2023
1,243 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.80 | 3.81 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.66 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 44.6% | 47.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D571.4% | E— | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C228.6% |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Hatley Health Care Inc, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF658Jun 15, 2023
Based on record reviews, interviews, review of the State Agency's Online Incident Reporting System Report, and a facility policy Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff clarified medication orders for Paxlovid for Resident Identifier (RI) #182. The resident received an order for Paxlovid on [DATE], the Medication Administration Record (MAR) did not match the medication pharmacy label instructions as to give two tablets twice a day; three nurses administered the medication at the incorrect dose for two days before it was determined to be incorrect dose. This affected one of one resident reviewed for receiving Paxlovid. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF690Jun 15, 2023
Based on observations, interviews, review of the medical record and review of the facility policy titled, CATHETER CARE the facility failed to ensure that Resident Identifier (RI) #36's urinary catheter drainage bag was not hanging above the level of the bladder. This affected RI #36 one of two residents sampled for Catheter care. Findings include: A facility policy titled, CATHETER CARE with a revision date of 04/14/2020, revealed: . Policy: To prevent the spread of infection. To promote quality resident personal care. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 10. Catheter tubing should lay across the resident's leg and the bad (bag) should hang below the level of the bladder. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Sep 9, 2021
Based on interviews and a review of the facility policy titled, [NAME] HEALTH CARE NARCOTIC POLICY, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #1's medical doctor and sponsor were notified when the resident's 8:00 a.m. dosage of [MEDICATION(S)] and [MEDICATION(S)] were not given on 8/02/2021. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one out of six residents sampled. Findings Include: A review of a policy titled, [NAME] HEALTH CARE NARCOTIC POLICY, dated 1/02/2014, revealed the following: . ***Any discrepancy in the narcotic count must be immediately reported to the Supervisor. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF760Sep 9, 2021
Based on interviews and review of facility policy titled, [NAME] HEALTH CARE NARCOTIC POLICY, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #3 gave Resident Identifier (RI) #1's [MEDICATION(S)] and [MEDICATION(S)] as ordered by the physician. This had the potential to affect one of six residents sampled. Findings Include: A review of facility policy titled, [NAME] HEALTH CARE NARCOTIC POLICY, dated 1/02/2014 that revealed the following: PURPOSE: To provide an accurate count of the narcotic, . 6. The charge nurse must sign the book at the time the narcotic is removed from the locked box . The surveyor conducted an interview on 9/08/2021 at 4:09 p.m., with (EI) #2, Director of Nursing (DON). […]
- No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadF550Jun 15, 2023
Based on observations, interviews, the Nursing Home Residents' Rights from the facility's admission packet, and the facility's policies for SERVING OF MEALS POLICY and RESIDENT DINING POLICY; the facility failed to ensure resident dignity by regularly serving meals on disposable dinnerware with disposable cutlery. This affected Resident Identifier (RI) #39 and RI #64 and had the potential to affect 81 of 81 residents receiving meals in the facility. Findings include: Nursing Home Residents' Rights, undated, from the facility's admission packet included the following: Residents of nursing homes have rights that are guaranteed to them under Federal and State laws. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 45 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 15, 2023Standard and complaint4 findings
- Sep 9, 2021Complaint2 findings
- May 9, 2019Standard and complaint3 findings
- May 10, 2018Standard6 findings
- Mar 16, 2017Standard4 findings
- Feb 25, 2016Standard12 findings
- Jan 8, 2015Standard4 findings
- Mar 27, 2014Standard2 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Oct 3, 2013Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 31, 2013—4 findings
- Feb 3, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction