Deficiency Index

Orchard Manor

Grove City, Pennsylvania · CCN 395793

23 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2018.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
93
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file15/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
121
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
Independent
County
Mercer · rural
Medicare-certified since
1989

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 132 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Pennsylvania.

Last survey on record

May 21, 2026

172 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.663.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.51—
Annual nurse turnover55.3%47.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$16,556 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ15.6%K—L—
Actual harmG15.6%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1583.3%E15.6%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 93 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6102×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F6552×

    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

  • F6842×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6952×

    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Orchard Manor, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Dec 18, 2025

    Based on review of clinical records, facility policy and documentation, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement sufficient monitoring interventions and supervision to prevent elopement (unauthorized leave from the facility). This failure placed residents at the facility in an Immediate Jeopardy situation for one of two residents reviewed who eloped from the facility (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of facility policy entitled, Safety and Supervision of Residents dated 4/1/25, indicated Our facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 26, 2023

    Based on observations, review of clinical records, facility policies and facility documentation, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision that resulted in actual harm including a laceration requiring seven sutures (stitches to close a wound), head injury, and skin tear of forearm, to one of two residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Comprehensive Care Plan dated 3/13/23, revealed that the care plan will describe at a minimum, the following: (a) the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the Resident's highest practical physical, mental and psychosocial well being . 6. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF610May 21, 2026

    Based on review of facility policy, clinical and facility records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation related to incidents and accidents for three of five residents reviewed (Residents R2, R3, and R4). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Incident Reporting dated 3/12/26, revealed the purpose of this policy is to ensure that all incidents involving residents, staff, visitors, or facility operations are promptly identified, investigated, documented, and reported in accordance with federal regulations, state law, and facility standards to protect resident health, safety, and rights. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF756Jan 26, 2023

    Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that pharmacy recommendations were completed for one resident and acted on in a timely manner for three of 18 residents reviewed (Residents R11, R23, and R26). Findings include: Review of Resident R11's clinical record revealed an admitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included psychotic disorders with delusions (a false, fixed belief involving a real-life situation that could be true but isn't), mood disorder, Alzheimer's Disease (progressive neurologic disorder that causes the brain to shrink (atrophy) and brain cells to die), anxiety disorder, and depression. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF726Aug 31, 2026

    Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all nursing staff had proper competencies to provide tracheostomy (surgical procedure that creates an opening in the front of the neck into the trachea to allow air to reach the lungs) care for one of one residents reviewed with a tracheostomy (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of a facility policy dated 7/01/26, Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning revealed under 11. Staffing and Competency-the Director of Nursing or designee will ensure that personnel assigned to residents requiring tracheostomy care have appropriate education, training, and documented competency. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 93 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 31, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 6, 2026Complaint3 findings
  • May 21, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 18, 2025Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 9, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 5, 2025Standard3 findings
  • Oct 31, 2024Standard5 findings
  • Nov 9, 2023Standard1 finding
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Sep 26, 2023Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Jul 6, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 26, 2023Standard4 findings
  • Mar 18, 2021Standard2 findings
  • Aug 23, 2019Standard13 findings
  • Mar 15, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 21, 2018Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 26, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 13, 2017Standard7 findings
  • Apr 11, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 26, 2016Standard9 findings
  • Jul 16, 2015Standard11 findings
  • Aug 15, 2014Standard1 finding
  • Sep 26, 2013—4 findings
  • Aug 4, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction