Deficiency Index

Huntingdon Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent

Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania · CCN 395913

29 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
89
Surveys
29
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file24/29

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
125
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
GENESIS HEALTHCARE
County
Montgomery
Medicare-certified since
1993

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded fewer weighted findings than most of its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 132 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Pennsylvania.

Last survey on record

Apr 3, 2026

220 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.783.42
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.79—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1161.1%E211.1%F211.1%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B211.1%C15.6%
CMS’s current file: 18 of the 89 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F6562×

    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5841×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6051×

    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Huntingdon Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 3, 2026

    Based on facility policy review, staff interview, and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor dish machine sanitizing solution to ensure that food was served in a sanitary manner. Findings include:Review of the facility policy entitled, Machine Warewashing and Sanitizing, dated March 31, 2026, revealed that for a low temperature dish machine, the appropriate amount of chlorine sanitizing solution is 50 parts per million (PPM). Staff were to record the sanitizer PPM at a minimum of daily on the Dish Machine Daily Temperature Record Log. In an interview during the kitchen tour on April 1, 2026, at 10:14 a.m., the Dietary Manager (DM) stated that the dish machine required a chemical solution to sanitize the dishware. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Feb 29, 2024

    Based on facility policy review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store food and maintain sanitary conditions in the dietary department. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy entitled, Use-By Dating Guidelines, last reviewed [DATE], revealed that prepared foods should be discarded within 72 hours. Review of the facility's policy entitled, Refrigerated/Frozen Storage, last reviewed [DATE], revealed that all foods were to be labelled with a use-by date once opened, refrigeration units were kept clean and organized, and if a food was removed from the original container, the food was to be labeled with a use-by date. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Mar 30, 2023

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions in the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the main kitchen on March 28, 2023, at 10:34 a.m., in the food preparation area, revealed a mop bucket with dirty water and a mop stored in the water. There were various particles of debris on the meat slicer. There was a small, black, winged insect above the food. Observation revealed a cart with an unidentified liquid on the bottom shelf of the cart. Clean coffee cups were on that cart. There was a dented can of peaches and a can of pineapples in dry storage. There were clean dishes stored on a rolling cart with various non-food related items. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Apr 3, 2026

    Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physicians' orders were implemented for four of 20 sampled residents. (Residents 5, 8, 83, and 98)Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, last reviewed March 31, 2026, revealed that staff were to obtain and record vital signs, if necessary, prior to medication administration and document necessary information in the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 had diagnoses that included heart disease and hypertension (high blood pressure). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF656Feb 29, 2024

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that addressed individual resident needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment for five of 32 sampled residents. (Residents 29, 32, 57, 68, and 70) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 29 had a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on August 4, 2023. According to the assessment, the resident was occasionally incontinent of urine. According to the Care Area Assessment (CAA) summary from that assessment, the facility identified that urinary continence was a problem area for the resident and should have been included on the resident's comprehensive care plan. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 89 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Apr 3, 2026Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Jul 28, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Feb 29, 2024Standard4 findings
  • Jan 21, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 26, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 30, 2023Standard7 findings
  • Mar 10, 2022Standard5 findings
  • Feb 15, 2022Complaint1 finding
Show the 21 earlier surveys
  • Nov 9, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 16, 2021Standard5 findings
  • Jan 20, 2021Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 23, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Jun 10, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 18, 2018Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Oct 13, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 31, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Sep 9, 2016Standard7 findings
  • May 13, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 19, 2016Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 25, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 20, 2015Standard5 findings
  • Feb 25, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 19, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Jan 16, 2014—1 finding
  • Aug 22, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 19, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 25, 2012—2 findings
  • Aug 9, 2011—2 findings
  • May 2, 2011—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction