Oakbrook Health and Rehabilitation
Thorp, Wisconsin · CCN 525472
13 surveys since 2014, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 28
- Surveys
- 13
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 58
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- REAL PROPERTY HEALTH FACILITIES
- County
- Clark · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 3
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=10, floor 20).
Last survey on record
May 27, 2026
166 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.39 | 3.73 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.74 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.9% | 45.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D990.0% | E— | F110.0% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6092×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6101×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6561×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Oakbrook Health and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Jan 29, 2026
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections which has the potential to affect all 39 residents.-R44 has open wounds with no Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in place.-RN I returned to work too soon after illness.-Inappropriate hand washing/gloving during cares (R2).Example 1 The facility protocol titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, last revised 01/26, reads in part: During an infectious disease outbreak, facility staff along the with medical director will follow prevailing infectious disease protocol at the time-as directed by local or state health agencies or the Centers for Disease Control and… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609May 27, 2026
Based on interview and record review the facility did not implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of physical abuse in accordance with section 1150B of the Act when an allegation of physical abuse was not reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours to the local law enforcement in accordance with state law through established procedures for 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed (R1).On 05/02/26, the facility was made aware of R1's allegation of abuse. The facility did not report this allegation to local law enforcement within 2 hours. This is evidenced by:Facility policy titled, Resident safety Abuse Policy, with reviewed date of 03/24, states in part: 8. Reporting Suspected Violations: .e. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Mar 10, 2026
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of physical abuse in accordance with section 1150B of the Act when an allegation of physical abuse was not reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours to the State Agency and local law enforcement in accordance with state law through established procedures for 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed (R1).On 02/03/26, the facility was made aware of R1's allegation of abuse. The facility did not report this allegation to State Agency (SA) or to local law enforcement within 2 hours. This is evidenced by:Facility policy titled, Resident safety Abuse Policy, with reviewed date of 03/24, states in part: 8. Reporting Suspected Violations: .e. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF641Jan 29, 2026
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the accuracy of assessment related to Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (R1).R1 had a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) 1 and 2 completed, which the MDS assessment did not reflect.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Surveyor reviewed R1's health record. PASARR 1 was completed upon admission dated 03/01/24. PASARR 2 was completed on 03/13/24.Surveyor reviewed R1's MDS assessments. The annual MDS on 03/01/24 indicated R1 did not have a PASARR 1 completed. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF881Jan 29, 2026
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure to follow their antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 1 of 1 resident (R36) reviewed. This is evidenced by:Facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program revised date of 08/25 documented in part. 9. Antibiotic Stewardship. A. The facility follows the current CDC guidelines for Preventing Antimicrobial Resistance among Long-Term Care Facility Residents and has adopted facility-specific protocols (i.e. see Urinary Tract Infection Protocol) for certain high antibiotic-use infections. B. Additional antibiotic use protocols and systems to monitor antibiotic use: i. […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 28 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 27, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Mar 10, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jan 29, 2026Standard3 findings
- Nov 10, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jun 13, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Oct 16, 2024Standard1 finding
- Sep 19, 2019Standard6 findings
- May 13, 2019Complaint1 finding
Show the 5 earlier surveys
- Sep 20, 2018Standard2 findings
- Jul 12, 2017Standard2 findings
- Aug 24, 2016Standard2 findings · 1 harm
- May 31, 2016Complaint1 finding
- Aug 13, 2014Standard4 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction