Deficiency Index

Norlite Nursing Center

Marquette, Michigan · CCN 235367

37 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
151
Surveys
37
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file31/37

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
99
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Marquette · rural
Medicare-certified since
1978

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 81 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Michigan.

Last survey on record

Jul 14, 2026

118 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.293.70
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.42—
Annual nurse turnover50.7%46.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$113,129 across 1 penalty
Payment denials
1

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG26.9%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1551.7%E724.1%F517.2%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 29 of the 151 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5502×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6922×

    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

  • F8042×

    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Norlite Nursing Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF684Nov 4, 2022

    This deficient practice has two separate DPS's part A and part B: DPS A: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective bowel management program for 17 Residents (#19, #4, #8, #9, #17, #27, #31, #46, #48, #49, #50, #52, #55, #59, #63, #66, & #225) of 73 residents reviewed. This deficient practice was identified as an immediate jeopardy (IJ) when one Resident (#19) developed signs and symptoms consistent with a bowel obstruction on 6/13/22. The facility failed to send Resident #19 to the emergency room (ER) per Resident #19's request and developed a perforated bowel which required emergency surgery on 6/20/22 and placement of a [CONDITION(S)] on 6/21/22. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF678Dec 1, 2021

    This citation pertains to Intake MI 352. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice for advanced directives of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was followed. This deficient practice was detected at an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) level due to staff not providing CPR to a Resident (#1) who had elected to have full code resuscitation status and was found to be unresponsive, without pulse, and not breathing. This deficient practice led to Resident #1 not receiving CPR prior to death and had the potential to affect 19 other residents who continued to reside at the facility, and who had elected to have Full Code resuscitation status. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF675Jan 28, 2026

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary equipment was readily available to provide care for two dependent Residents (#62 and #46) out of 18 residents reviewed for quality of life. This deficient practice resulted in emotional distress, feelings of frustration, social isolation, and physical discomfort.Findings include:Resident #62 (R62)Review of R62's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 3/8/23 with diagnoses including hemiparesis (partial weakness, reduced strength, and/or impaired motor function on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke), multiple sclerosis (MS), muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Dec 14, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a Resident-to-Resident physical abuse, resulting in minimal harm for one Resident (R38) of two residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in numerous bruising sites and persistent fear of further abuse. Findings include: Intake Number: MI00139309 Review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 9/10/23, revealed the following, .On 9/10/23 at 1556 (3:56 p.m.), (R50) exited his room on foot wearing socks, a shirt, and his brief. He glanced up the hall for a moment, and then proceeded to walk across the hall into (R38's) room. This had occurred 3 times prior in the past two weeks per (R38's) report. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Aug 11, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed toensure timely follow-up with a physician specialist according to physician order and professional standards of practice for one Resident (#4) of 16 residents reviewed for quality of care. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm when Resident #4 developed severe tissue damage with the potential for infection and [CONDITION(S)]. Findings include: Resident #4 Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . coli) (a type of bacteria normally found in the lower intestinal tract of humans), urinary tract infection, [CONDITION(S)], acquired (surgical) absence of the left leg above and right leg above knee, cognitive communication deficit, and diabetes. […]

Read 25 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 25 of 151 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 14, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 28, 2026Standard and complaint12 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 21, 2024Standard6 findings
  • Aug 20, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 14, 2023Standard and complaint7 findings · 1 harm
  • Sep 7, 2023Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 4, 2022Standard11 findings · 1 harm
  • Aug 10, 2022Complaint3 findings
Show the 29 earlier surveys
  • Dec 1, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 11, 2021Standard14 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 23, 2019Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 12, 2019Standard10 findings
  • Aug 21, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jul 20, 2018Standard10 findings
  • May 31, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 29, 2018Complaint4 findings
  • Jul 7, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • May 18, 2017Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Mar 15, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 2, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 21, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Aug 13, 2015Standard8 findings
  • Jul 23, 2014Standard3 findings
  • Jun 19, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 30, 2014—2 findings
  • May 23, 2013Standard10 findings
  • Nov 2, 2012—1 finding
  • Oct 17, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 25, 2012—1 finding
  • Jul 25, 2012—2 findings
  • Apr 26, 2012—7 findings
  • Feb 29, 2012—2 findings
  • Jun 16, 2011—3 findings
  • Apr 14, 2011—1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2011—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction