Deficiency Index

New Mark Rehab and Healthcare Center

Kansas City, Missouri · CCN 265308

33 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2015.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
135
Surveys
33
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse5

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file21/33

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
199
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
AMA HOLDINGS
County
Clay
Medicare-certified since
1987

CMS ratings

Overall
1
Health inspection
2
Staffing
1
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 75 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Missouri.

Last survey on record

Jul 29, 2026

103 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.513.15
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.37—
Annual nurse turnover70.6%58.6%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$12,279 across 2 penalties

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG48.7%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2452.2%E1634.8%F24.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 46 of the 135 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5844×

    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

  • F6093×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

  • F6583×

    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

  • F8123×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F6002×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at New Mark Rehab and Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF658Sep 26, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate wound dressing orders were obtained and in place for one resident (Resident #2), when a negative pressure wound dressing (Wound Vac) was left in place from September 9, 2025 until September 19, 2025, causing the wound to open and bleed excessively when the dressing was removed. This effected one of four sampled residents. Facility census was 152.Review of the facility provided policy titled, Wound Management, dated October 24, 2022 showed:-Purpose is to provide a system for treatment and management of residents with wounds including pressure and non-pressure ulcers; -A resident who has a wound will receive necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Sep 26, 2025

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect Resident #1's safety when he/she eloped from the facility and was later found in the facility parking lot with a laceration to the forehead. The facility census was 152.On November 17, 2025 , the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance incident which occurred on September 7, 2025. On September 7, 2025 facility administration was notified of the incident, an investigation immediately began and corrective actions were implemented to include:-All staff education on wandering/elopement, falls, door alarms, door checks, behaviors/dementia and abuse/neglect, verification that all door alarms were functioning, verification all residents were accounted for on the memory care unit, care plan meeting with family, audit… […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF600Mar 26, 2025

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse when Resident #1 hit and restrained Resident #2 resulting in a scratch to Resident #2's left cheek, redness to his/her right eye, abrasion to right eyebrow, and redness and bruises to the right forearm and bicep. The facility census was 153. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program, revised 10/24/22, showed: - Each resident has the right to be free from abuse. The facility has zero-tolerance for abuse. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 13, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision and protective oversight for one sampled resident (Resident #1) when he/she was found with an acute oblique (break is at an angle) fracture to the right femur. The facility census was 105. Review of the facility's Positioning Policy/Procedure, dated March 2021, showed: -Any resident is an appropriate candidate for the Positioning Program if he/she: -Is unable to turn and get into position independently -Needs assistance in turning or positioning due to any mental or physical limitation. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF658Jan 6, 2026

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that licensed staff's responsibilities were completed according to acceptable standards of professional clinical practice when two licensed nurses RN-A, LPN-A and the Social Worker (SSD) failed to document a change or update of one resident's condition in the clinical medical record (the clinical medical record is accessible to all facility nursing staff and providers) that would have allowed other clinical staff to know what changes or updates had been done for one Resident (Resident #1), when Resident #1 had a critical potassium lab level and refused to be taken to the hospital for potassium to be replaced, and then unexpectedly died three days later. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 135 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jul 29, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 26, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 6, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 31, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 21, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Sep 26, 2025Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 19, 2025Standard4 findings
  • May 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
Show the 25 earlier surveys
  • Mar 26, 2025Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 11, 2024Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Feb 13, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Sep 29, 2022Standard14 findings
  • May 17, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 19, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • May 26, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Sep 5, 2019Standard10 findings
  • Apr 12, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 26, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Apr 4, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 7, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 27, 2017Standard5 findings
  • Sep 15, 2016Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Apr 20, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 9, 2015Standard and complaint14 findings
  • Oct 7, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 18, 2015Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 11, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 23, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 16, 2014Standard10 findings
  • Feb 11, 2014—1 finding
  • Nov 21, 2013—9 findings
  • Nov 5, 2012—8 findings
  • Sep 22, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction