Mountain Top Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center
Mountain Top, Pennsylvania · CCN 395542
37 surveys since 2011, 10 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 166
- Surveys
- 37
- Harm or worse
- 10
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 106
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- CENTURY HEALTHCARE
- County
- Luzerne
- Medicare-certified since
- 1982
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 132 for-profit facilities of 100–127 beds in Pennsylvania.
Last survey on record
Feb 20, 2026
262 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.46 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 40.4% | 47.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Abuse icon
- Flagged by CMS on Care Compare
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G310.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D1551.7% | E931.0% | F13.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B13.4% | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6002×
Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
- F6572×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F6842×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6922×
Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
- F6972×
Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Mountain Top Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF677Feb 20, 2026
Based on observations, clinical record review, review of select facility policies and procedures, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident 34, who was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs), with the care and services necessary to maintain proper personal hygiene and grooming, including nail care and monitoring of a contracted hand. As a result of this failure, the resident developed an open wound to the palm that required treatment and caused pain. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Feb 20, 2026
Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility policies, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who entered the facility with existing pressure-related skin damage received necessary care and services to prevent additional pressure injuries and prevent worsening of existing wounds. This failure resulted in actual harm, unstageable to Stage 4 pressure areas, for one of 29 residents reviewed (Resident 11.) Findings include: According to the US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research &; Quality, the pressure ulcer best practice bundle incorporates three critical components in preventing pressure ulcers: Comprehensive skin assessment, standardized pressure ulcer risk assessment, and care planning and implementation to… […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF692Feb 20, 2026
Based on review of clinical records, select facility policies, physician orders, weight records, MDS assessments, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status to the extent possible. The facility failed to reassess and adjust enteral nutrition and oral intake in response to significant progressive weight loss for one resident (Resident 31), resulting in actual harm as evidenced by a 36.8 pound (21.1 percent) unplanned weight loss in two months. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF640Apr 18, 2025
Based on clinical record review and staff interview and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual, it was determined the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to the required electronic system, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) System, within 14 days of completion for six of 22 residents reviewed (Residents 70, 77, 58, 100, 78, and 47). […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Feb 20, 2026
Based on a review of clinical records and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promotes and enhances each resident's dignity and quality of life by failing to respond in a timely manner to residents' requests for assistance, including experiences reported by 5 out of 6 residents during a resident group interview (Residents 19, 58, 64, 80, and 101). Findings include: During a resident group interview on February 19, 2026, at 10:00 AM, five out of six alert and oriented residents (Residents 19, 58, 64, 80, and 101) indicated that they have concerns about long wait times for care. One out of the six residents in attendance indicated that she is independent and does not need to ring her call bell for staff assistance. […]
Read 27 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 27 of 166 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Feb 20, 2026Standard19 findings · 3 harm
- Jul 22, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Apr 18, 2025Standard3 findings
- Jun 28, 2024Standard6 findings
- Jul 28, 2023Standard7 findings
- Aug 19, 2022Standard6 findings
- Feb 24, 2022Complaint1 finding
- Nov 18, 2021Complaint5 findings
Show the 29 earlier surveys
- Sep 24, 2021Standard12 findings
- Aug 19, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Jun 10, 2021Complaint4 findings
- Nov 6, 2020Standard13 findings · 1 harm
- Oct 29, 2020Infection control3 findings
- Aug 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Apr 18, 2019Standard3 findings
- Feb 28, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Nov 17, 2018Complaint4 findings
- Aug 9, 2018Complaint1 finding
- May 11, 2018Standard5 findings · 3 harm
- Oct 31, 2017Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 16, 2017Complaint3 findings
- Apr 7, 2017Standard5 findings
- Jan 4, 2017Complaint1 finding
- May 19, 2016Standard5 findings
- Dec 29, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Jun 3, 2015Standard6 findings
- Jul 3, 2014Standard4 findings
- Dec 12, 2013—3 findings
- Jun 27, 2013—13 findings · 2 harm
- May 24, 2013—4 findings
- Dec 7, 2012—6 findings
- Jul 23, 2012—1 finding
- May 24, 2012—5 findings
- Feb 9, 2012—1 finding
- Jun 23, 2011—3 findings
- May 5, 2011—2 findings
- Apr 22, 2011—1 finding
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction