Monroe Health & Rehab Center
Charlottesville, Virginia · CCN 495326
21 surveys since 2011, 16 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 174
- Surveys
- 21
- Harm or worse
- 16
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 180
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP
- County
- Albemarle
- Medicare-certified since
- 1998
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 73 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Virginia.
Last survey on record
Apr 23, 2026
200 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.28 | 3.34 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.47 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 45.0% | 50.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $10,539 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G13.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2784.4% | E26.3% | F26.3% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6845×
Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
- F6573×
Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
- F8423×
Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
- F6412×
Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Monroe Health & Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Aug 21, 2025
Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide care in a manner to minimize/prevent accidents/injury for one resident (Resident #17-R17) in a survey sample of eighteen residents, which resulted in harm for R17. The findings included:1. For R17, the facility staff failed to transfer the resident with a mechanical lift in a manner to prevent accidents and injury, which resulted in a significant injury, which was harm. The facility self-identified the deficient practice and achieved past non-compliance on 10/9/24. On 8/19/25-8/20/25, attempts were made to visit with and interview R17 but were not successful since R17 was out of the facility due to a medical procedure. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF686Sep 22, 2021
Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess and implement interventions to prevent a pressure ulcer for one of twelve residents in the survey sample, Resident #4. Resident #4 developed a sacral pressure ulcer initially identified as unstageable with necrotic tissue. There was no prior assessment of impaired skin on the sacrum. A nurse with knowledge of redness on the sacrum failed to document or report the redness prior to the development of the ulcer. The findings include: Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 23, 2026
Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to properly store, prepare and distribute food in the facility kitchen in a manner that would prevent foodborne illnesses.The findings included:The facility staff failed to maintain one of two kitchen freezers in proper working order, freezer #2 contained multiple food items that were not fully frozen. The facility staff had stacked wet pans nesting them while wet and a large scoop was stored inside an uncovered container of powdered thickener. There was a white cloth lying on the floor of the refrigerator and a roll of buffet ham was stored above produce, creating a risk of cross-contamination. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF925Aug 21, 2025
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective pest control program on three of three resident units and in the main kitchen and common areas of the facility. The findings included:On 8/19/25 at 1:55 p.m., a review of resident council minutes revealed that on 7/7/25, the resident council reported that Residents are seeing gnats and roaches. Both residents listed on the grievance lived on the 200 South unit. During the resident council meeting held Dec. 18, 2024, it noted . The group all mentioned an increase in cockroach sightings. In the September 2024 meeting it noted, . Resident [name redacted] stated he spotted a cockroach in his room by his bed recently. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF684Jul 21, 2022
Based on a medication pass and pour observation, clinical record review, staff interview, facility document review, and during the course of a complaint investigation the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] #39) and failed to accurately assess skin impairments for one of 27 residents (Resident #24). 1. The facility staff failed to follow physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . 2. The facility staff failed to follow physician's orders [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] #95. 3. The facility staff failed to ensure transportation for outside rehabilitation appointments for Resident #11. 4. The facility staff failed to ensure transportation to an endocrinologist appointment for #39. 5. […]
Read 35 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 35 of 174 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 23, 2026Standard10 findings
- Aug 21, 2025Complaint8 findings · 1 harm
- Jul 30, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jul 21, 2022Standard7 findings
- Sep 22, 2021Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 12, 2020Standard5 findings
- Feb 26, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Dec 13, 2018Standard and complaint10 findings · 2 harm
Show the 13 earlier surveys
- Oct 25, 2017Complaint6 findings
- Sep 11, 2017Standard and complaint28 findings · 4 harm
- Apr 5, 2017Complaint7 findings · 1 harm
- Mar 8, 2017Complaint9 findings · 3 harm
- Sep 14, 2016Standard2 findings
- Aug 13, 2015Standard and complaint3 findings · 1 harm
- Aug 28, 2014Standard and complaint8 findings
- Oct 22, 2013—6 findings
- Aug 29, 2013Standard19 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 26, 2012—1 finding
- Aug 2, 2012Standard25 findings · 1 harm
- Sep 1, 2011—12 findings
- Mar 23, 2011—3 findings · 1 harm
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction