Middlesboro Nursing and Rehabilitation Facility
Middlesboro, Kentucky · CCN 185240
12 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 32
- Surveys
- 12
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 95
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- BLUEGRASS HEALTH KY
- County
- Bell · rural
- Medicare-certified since
- 1991
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 5
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Jun 12, 2026
150 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.94 | 3.61 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.49 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 44.0% | 45.4% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D150.0% | E150.0% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Middlesboro Nursing and Rehabilitation Facility, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Jun 12, 2026
Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer medications in accordance with provider order and established nursing practice for 1 of 19 sampled residents, Resident 3 (R3).Review of facility investigation, and interviews with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2, revealed R3 received medications per rectum rather than the ordered oral route.The findings include:Review of facility policy, Medication Administration Policy, subtitled Medication Preparation, last reviewed 12/22/2025, revealed the facility would ensure medications were administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, as well as good nursing principles and practices. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF609Jun 17, 2021
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations of abuse, which involved four (4) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #2, #3, #4 and #5) were reported to the administrator of the facility and other officials, that included the State Survey Agency immediately but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation was made and in accordance with State Laws. Interviews with staff and review of resident records revealed Resident #2 was observed lying in bed with Resident #1 which was reported to the Administrator and State Agencies as required. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF610Jun 17, 2021
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility investigation and policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. Review of a facility investigation revealed on [DATE] Resident #2 was observed lying in bed with his/her arms around Resident #1. Interviews with staff and review of resident records indicated Resident #2 had exhibited inappropriate sexual behaviors toward other residents, on at least three (3) different occasions, prior to the incident that occurred on [DATE]. Further interviews also indicated Resident #1 wandered into other resident rooms at times, as he/she had difficulty finding his/her room. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF744Jun 17, 2021
Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of a facility investigation and policies, it was determined the facility failed to ensure two (2) of five (5) sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2) received appropriate dementia treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Resident #1, who was cognitively impaired and had a history of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . Although, the facility had developed interventions to address Resident #1's wandering behaviors, the facility failed to implement the interventions to prevent the resident from wandering into unsafe areas. Resident #2, who had a history of [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 32 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Jun 12, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Jun 17, 2021Complaint3 findings
- Sep 26, 2019Standard1 finding
- May 18, 2017Standard1 finding
- May 12, 2016Standard1 finding
- Apr 30, 2015Standard5 findings
- Apr 24, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Feb 13, 2014Standard2 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
- Mar 27, 2013—2 findings
- Nov 30, 2012—1 finding
- Mar 1, 2012—4 findings
- Jan 27, 2011—9 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Kenwood Health and Rehabilitation CenterRichmondno harm findings
- Riverside Care & Rehabilitation CenterCalhounno harm findings
- Knott County Health & Rehabilitation CenterHindmanno harm findings
- Hermitage Care and Rehabilitation CenterOwensborono harm findings
- Maple Health and RehabilitationGreenville1 harm finding
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction