Deficiency Index

Maple Health and Rehabilitation

Greenville, Kentucky · CCN 185294

12 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2022.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
27
Surveys
12
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file11/12

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
97
Ownership
For profit - Partnership
Chain
SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER
County
Muhlenberg · rural
Medicare-certified since
1991

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
3
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 21, 2019

2,790 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.413.61
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.52—
Annual nurse turnover29.9%45.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD7100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 7 of the 27 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Maple Health and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF908Feb 25, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the mechanical lift slings were maintained according to the manufacturer's recommendations for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1). Per the manufacturer's recommendations for the use of the mechanical lift slings, the slings had a limited warranty for a period of one (1) year from the date of initial use. Further, the sling would not be used when ripped, torn, or frayed. However, interview with the Administrator revealed the mechanical lift Sling #25, used on Resident #1, was purchased on 07/24/2018 and was utilized for a period of over four (4) years without staff monitoring the usage of the sling. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF678Aug 21, 2026

    Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that the electronic medical record reflected the resident's choice of code status for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident (R) 3) reviewed for advance directives. Record review revealed R3 initially expressed a desire to initiate a code status of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). However, the code status reflected in the physician order was to be Full Code with no documented evidence that this was the resident and/or their health surrogate's current choice. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 27 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 21, 2026Standard1 finding
  • Feb 25, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 21, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Feb 22, 2018Standard3 findings
  • Nov 2, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jan 29, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Jun 25, 2015Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 18, 2014Standard3 findings
Show the 4 earlier surveys
  • Oct 18, 2013—3 findings
  • Oct 4, 2013Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 11, 2012—1 finding
  • Mar 30, 2011—1 finding

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction