Deficiency Index

Riverside Care & Rehabilitation Center

Calhoun, Kentucky · CCN 185209

15 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2016.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
48
Surveys
15
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file13/15

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
79
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE
County
Mc Lean
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
4
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=2, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 13, 2025

606 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.883.61
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.84—
Annual nurse turnover43.5%45.4%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD375.0%E125.0%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 48 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Riverside Care & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF550Mar 13, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect, dignity and care in a manner and an environment that enhances his or her quality of life by not announcing themselves before entering the room of (5) residents. (Resident (R) R9, R16, R17, R27, and R28). The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, reviewed 09/13/2024, revealed all residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity. These rights would be promoted and protected by the facility. All residents would be treated in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Mar 13, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, record review, review of facility policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (1) of three (3) residents. Observation of wound care for Resident (R)54 revealed a failure to remove contaminated gloves prior to touching Resident's clothing, bedding, walker, table, and chair. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 48 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 13, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Jan 23, 2020Standard2 findings
  • Nov 2, 2018Standard10 findings
  • Apr 4, 2018Complaint2 findings
  • Sep 26, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Jul 20, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 11, 2016Standard1 finding
  • Jun 30, 2016Complaint3 findings · 3 harm
Show the 7 earlier surveys
  • May 20, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Mar 14, 2016Complaint3 findings
  • Jul 16, 2015Standard6 findings
  • May 23, 2014Standard2 findings
  • Jun 27, 2013—5 findings
  • May 25, 2012—2 findings
  • Mar 2, 2011—4 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction