Deficiency Index

Mentor Ridge Health and Rehabilitation

Mentor, Ohio · CCN 366455

6 surveys since 2019, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
10
Surveys
6
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2019–2026
’19’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file4/6

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
99
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
FOUNDATIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS
County
Lake
Medicare-certified since
2017

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=8, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Feb 19, 2026

263 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.713.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.60—
Annual nurse turnover52.2%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD5100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 10 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Mentor Ridge Health and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684Oct 1, 2021

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure timely interventions were implemented to appropriately treat a deteriorating [CONDITION(S)] for Resident #64. Actual Harm occurred on 09/18/21 when Resident #64 had an MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) exam of the right foot on 09/07/21, which revealed findings for [CONDITION(S)] (infection of bone or bone marrow). This was not reported to the resident's primary care physician (PCP) until 09/08/21 and was not addressed by a physician until 09/16/21. Resident #64 was subsequently admitted to the hospital with [CONDITION(S)] (infection in the blood). This affected one (Resident #64) of three (Resident's #1, #45 and #64) reviewed for wound care. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Mar 8, 2021

    Based on observations, staff interview, review of the facility's Coronavirus (COVID-19) policy, review of the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Memo QSO-20-14-NH (revised 3/13/20), review of the World Health Organization (WHO) hand hygiene brochure, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was implemented after care for Resident #3, who was on droplet precautions, to potentially prevent the spread of COVID-19 infections. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing on the West Unit. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Feb 19, 2026

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant weight gain for a resident with a diagnosis of fluid overload. This affected one resident (#22) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 98.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 01/05/26 with a primary diagnosis of fluid overload and other diagnoses including unspecified fracture of the right tibia shaft, effusion of the right knee, type two diabetes, morbid (severe) obesity, hypertension (high blood pressure), and hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood).Review of Resident #22's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January 2026 revealed an order dated 01/06/26 for a low… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF684Feb 19, 2026

    Based on record review, resident interview, staff interviews, review of the Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely and adequately respond after identification of an incident with injury including assessing on the day of the incident, timely notification of the physician, notification to hospice, completing a skin assessment and logging the incident on the facility's incident log. This affected one resident (#86) of one resident reviewed for incidents. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Feb 19, 2026

    Based on record review, observation, interview, review of the facility policy and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) informational sheet, the facility failed to ensure appropriate testing was completed to rule out multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) and use appropriate enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for MDROs. This affected one Resident (#11) of four residents reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTIs). The facility census was 98.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 08/15/23 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and anemia. […]

Read all 10 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Feb 19, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Feb 22, 2024Standard2 findings
  • Oct 1, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 29, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 8, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • May 17, 2019Complaint2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction