Heritage of Hudson
Hudson, Ohio · CCN 366404
11 surveys since 2014, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 30
- Surveys
- 11
- Harm or worse
- 0
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 80
- Ownership
- For profit - Corporation
- Chain
- Independent
- County
- Summit
- Medicare-certified since
- 2013
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 4
- Staffing
- 2
- Quality measures
- 4
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).
Last survey on record
May 21, 2025
537 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.23 | 3.47 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.56 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 39.4% | 49.2% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G— | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D787.5% | E— | F112.5% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Heritage of Hudson, in the surveyor’s own words.
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 10, 2023
Based on observations, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen and unit pantries were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and ensure staff serving food wore hair restraints. This had the potential to affect 68 out of 69 residents that received meals from the facility. Resident #46 was identified as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Tour of the kitchen on 08/07/23 at 8:25 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #100 revealed liquid spilled on the bottom of the reach-in refrigerator located near the cooking area; the bakers rack had dried food on the shelves, and the walls near the cooking area and dish area had food splatter on them. Observation in the pantry located on 100 unit on 08/07/23 at 8:34 A.M. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF656May 21, 2025
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to identify triggers and effective interventions related to a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for Resident #36. This affected one resident (#36) of 21 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of PTSD. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 was severely impaired cognitively, exhibited inattention and disorganized thinking behaviors, and had rejected care. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF677May 21, 2025
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinence care was provided to Resident #15, #36 and #48. This affected three residents (#15, #36, and #48) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, generalized muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, aphasia, depression, and anxiety. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF692May 21, 2025
Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure weekly weights were obtained as a documented intervention to monitor nutrition status for Resident #50 who had a significant weight loss. This affected one resident (#50) out of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), insomnia, diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF698May 21, 2025
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Resident #33 received dialysis services consistent with professional standards of practice and the person-centered care plan. This affected one resident (#33) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified one resident (#33) as receiving dialysis services. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed a readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including stage four chronic kidney disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 05/01/25 revealed Resident #33 had intact cognition and medically complex conditions including renal insufficiency or renal failure. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 30 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 21, 2025Standard5 findings
- Aug 10, 2023Standard1 finding
- Nov 16, 2021Complaint1 finding
- Jun 21, 2021Standard and complaint2 findings
- Jan 6, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Feb 28, 2019Standard6 findings
- Nov 2, 2017Complaint2 findings
- Dec 1, 2016Standard3 findings
Show the 3 earlier surveys
- Oct 27, 2015Complaint3 findings
- Sep 2, 2015Standard3 findings
- May 21, 2014Standard3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction