Meadow View Health Services
Sheboygan, Wisconsin · CCN 525605
22 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2024.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 89
- Surveys
- 22
- Harm or worse
- 1
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 50
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE
- County
- Sheboygan
- Medicare-certified since
- 1996
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 5
- Quality measures
- 2
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 92 for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Wisconsin.
Last survey on record
Dec 18, 2025
326 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.59 | 3.73 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 1.19 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 23.3% | 45.7% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G17.7% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D753.8% | E323.1% | F215.4% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6102×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6892×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F8122×
Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
- F6071×
Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
- F6231×
Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Meadow View Health Services, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Jul 2, 2024
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure interventions were followed to prevent a fall for 1 resident (R1) of 4 sampled residents. On 6/1/24, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-C did not transfer R1 according to R1's plan of care which resulted in a fall with a left hip fracture. Findings include: On 7/2/24, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, pressure ulcer of right heel, unstageable, fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, and pneumonia. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Dec 18, 2025
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect all 31 residents residing in the facility.The facility did not thaw frozen food via a safe thawing method.The facility did not consistently follow safe food cooling protocol.The facility did not consistently dispose of food items in a manner that ensured food safety.Findings include:During an initial kitchen tour that began at 8:17 AM on 12/16/25, Dietary Manager (DM)-D indicated the facility follows the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code.Thawing:The 2022 FDA Food Code documents at 3-501.13 Thawing: Except as specified in (D) of this section, time/temperature control for safety food shall be thawed: (A)… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 28, 2024
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 32 of 33 residents residing in the facility. One resident received nutrition exclusively via tube feeding. The facility did not consistently label, date, and dispose of food items in a manner that ensured food safety. The facility did not consistently follow safe food cooling protocol. Findings include: On 8/27/24 at 11:50 AM, Surveyor interviewed District Manager (DM)-C who stated the facility followed the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jun 30, 2021
Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure food was stored in accordance with food safety standards. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The dining room refrigerator containing resident food was not being monitored for temperatures. Resident food stored in the dining room refrigerator was not labeled with open dates. Refrigeration temperature logs for seven units within the kitchen were not consistently monitored for temperatures. Findings: Wisconsin Food Code states: Potentially Hazardous Food (Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food), Hot and Cold Holding. (A) Except during preparation, cooking, or cooling . […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF687Dec 18, 2025
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the provision of foot and nail care for 8 residents (R) (R21, R5, R9, R10, R6, R27, R29, and R30) of 8 sampled residents with diabetes.The facility did not provide daily diabetic foot checks for R21, R5, R9, R10, R6, R27, R29, and R30 in accordance with professional standards of practice, the residents' care plans, and the facility's policy. Findings include:The facility's Skin Integrity-Foot Care policy, dated 12/15/23, indicates: It is the policy of the facility to ensure residents receive proper treatment and care within professional standards of practice and state scope of practice, as applicable, to maintain mobility and good foot health. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 89 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Dec 18, 2025Standard4 findings
- Aug 28, 2024Standard and complaint5 findings
- Jul 2, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jul 19, 2023Standard and complaint3 findings
- Mar 20, 2023Complaint1 finding
- Jul 20, 2022Standard7 findings
- Nov 30, 2021Complaint2 findings
- Jun 30, 2021Standard3 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
- Sep 9, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Aug 5, 2020Complaint1 finding
- Oct 4, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Sep 11, 2019Standard10 findings
- May 2, 2019Complaint2 findings
- Jan 8, 2019Complaint1 finding
- Jul 26, 2018Standard9 findings
- May 10, 2017Standard6 findings
- Apr 13, 2016Standard and complaint5 findings
- Mar 19, 2015Standard4 findings
- May 8, 2014Standard7 findings
- Apr 25, 2013—4 findings
- Apr 26, 2012—7 findings
- Feb 2, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction