Deficiency Index

Martinsville Health and Rehab

Martinsville, Virginia · CCN 495143

18 surveys since 2011, 6 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
221
Surveys
18
Harm or worse
6
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse6

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file14/18

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
140
Ownership
For profit - Limited Liability company
Chain
TRIO HEALTHCARE
County
Martinsville City · rural
Medicare-certified since
1984

CMS ratings

Overall
2
Health inspection
2
Staffing
2
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 73 for-profit facilities with 128 or more beds in Virginia.

Last survey on record

Jan 15, 2026

298 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.943.34
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.76—

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG34.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD5680.0%E811.4%F22.9%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C11.4%
CMS’s current file: 70 of the 221 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6843×

    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

  • F7553×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • F5582×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F5612×

    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.

  • F5802×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Martinsville Health and Rehab, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Jan 15, 2026

    Based on observations and staff interview, the facility staff failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner. The findings included:During an initial tour of the kitchen on 01/12/26 at 11:50 am, surveyor observed a box of ground meat with a handwritten note that read, Out to thaw 01/05/26, use by 01/11/26. Surveyor pointed this out to dietary manager. Dietary manager stated they would discard the meat. Surveyor observed the dishwasher to have a dried, crusty substance on the top corners. Dietary manager stated they clean this substance off every day, and it's back the next morning. Surveyor observed the oven in the kitchen to have dried food substance on the front outside of the oven doors. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF842Jan 15, 2026

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist documented their findings in the clinical records after completing drug regimen reviews for (5) five of (5) five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Resident #2, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #9, and Resident #55. The findings included: The consultant pharmacist failed to document their findings regarding drug regimen reviews in the resident's clinical records. During clinical record reviews the survey team were unable to determine if the consultant pharmacist had made recommendations during their monthly drug regimen reviews. The pharmacist had only documented, chart review completed by consultant pharmacist. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF755Jan 31, 2024

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensue medications were available for administration for 1 of 13 residents, Resident #1. The findings included: For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to ensure the medication SPS Oral solution (Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate [Kayexalate]) was available for administration. Resident #1's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 01/04/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 7 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Resident #1's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary which read in part, SPS Oral suspension 15 GM/60 ML (Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate). […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF760Jan 31, 2024

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure 2 of 13 resident were free of significant medication errors, Resident #1 and Resident #1 and Resident #10. The findings included: 1. For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to administer the medications insulin glargine, metoprolol, and SPS Oral solution (sodium polystyrene sulfonate) per the physician's orders. Resident #1's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 01/04/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 7 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF759Jun 15, 2022

    Based on observation and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the medication error rate was 5% or less during medication pass and pour observation on 6/13/2022. During medication pass and pour observation on 6/13/2022, the surveyor observed 25 opportunities for error. The surveyor observed 3 medication errors affecting 2 residents. The calculated error rate was 12% (3/25=.12 X 100%= 12%). Error observation detail: 1- For Resident #47, the antidepressant medication [MEDICATION(S)] was unavailable and the ordered dose of [MEDICATION(S)] was not available. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

Read 26 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 26 of 221 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 15, 2026Standard and complaint19 findings
  • Jan 31, 2024Complaint8 findings
  • Jun 15, 2022Standard8 findings
  • Sep 14, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 19, 2021Complaint5 findings
  • Sep 21, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 18, 2019Standard37 findings · 2 harm
  • Jun 4, 2018Standard30 findings · 1 harm
Show the 10 earlier surveys
  • Apr 6, 2017Standard9 findings
  • Apr 21, 2016Standard22 findings
  • Jun 4, 2015Standard12 findings
  • Jul 24, 2014Standard8 findings
  • Oct 23, 2013Complaint22 findings · 3 harm
  • Jun 13, 2013—10 findings
  • Jan 16, 2013—4 findings
  • Jul 26, 2012—12 findings
  • Aug 18, 2011—4 findings
  • May 19, 2011—9 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction