Mansfield Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation
Storrs Mansfield, Connecticut · CCN 075402
23 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 63
- Surveys
- 23
- Harm or worse
- 4
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 98
- Ownership
- For profit - Limited Liability company
- Chain
- NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES
- County
- Capitol
- Medicare-certified since
- 1994
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 2
- Health inspection
- 2
- Staffing
- 1
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.
Weighted by harm level, against 27 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Connecticut.
Last survey on record
May 7, 2026
186 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 3.86 | 3.64 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.72 | — |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $24,460 across 2 penalties
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G39.1% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D2266.7% | E39.1% | F39.1% |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B13.0% | C13.0% |
Most frequently cited here
In CMS’s current monthly file.
- F6894×
Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
- F5803×
Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
- F6093×
Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
- F6102×
Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
- F6562×
Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Mansfield Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 4, 2025
Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who was dependent on staff for transfers, the facility failed to ensure two (2) staff members were present during a mechanical lift transfer resulting in the resident tipping in the lift, hitting his/her head and sustaining an injury. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included severe dementia with agitation, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the membrane that covers it) affecting the left non-dominant side, muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 10, 2025
Based on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews, for two of six sampled residents (Residents #13 and #47) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the required staff assistance was utilized during the use of the mechanical lift, and for one of six sampled residents (Resident #33) the facility failed to ensure the required staff assistance was in place during a mechanical lift transfer and failed to ensure the resident was attached to the lift correctly, which resulted in an accident and injury. The findings include: 1. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Apr 11, 2023
Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (2) of six (6) residents reviewed for (Resident #204), the facility failed to ensure a resident had appropriate supervision while in the bathroom, and that leg rests were removed from the wheelchair prior to a transfer, resulting in an injury and for accidents for (Resident # 31), the facility failed to ensure staff remove the plastic covering from a hot beverage within accordance to facility practice to prevent a burn and . The findings included : 1. Resident #204 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, and weakness of right dominant side following a stroke. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 10, 2025
Based on observation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that food stored in the refrigerator and freezer was labeled with an expiration and open date, and the staff failed to wear beard restraints. The findings include: During the initial brief tour of the kitchen on 4/2/25 at 9:41 AM with the Dietary Manager identified cooler #2 contained eight waffles in an open package stored with no expiration date and no open date as well as a Starbucks mocha drink that was 2/3 full. Interview on 4/2/25 at 9:42 AM with the Dietary Manager identified the waffles should be labeled with the open date and the expiration date. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Apr 10, 2025
Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #57) reviewed for pressure injuries, the facility failed to ensure facility staff used appropriate PPE when providing care to a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and failed to ensure infection control surveillance data collection reports were complete and compiled on a monthly basis. The findings include: 1. Review of the infection control program for the period of April 2023 to January 2024 with the Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RN #7) and the Infection Preventionist (IP) Nurse (RN #4) on 4/7/25 at 12:57 PM failed to identify that monthly surveillance infection reports and analysis of infection trends were completed from April… […]
Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 63 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- May 7, 2026Complaint1 finding
- Apr 21, 2026Complaint3 findings
- Dec 4, 2025Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
- Apr 10, 2025Standard and complaint6 findings · 1 harm
- Jan 13, 2025Complaint2 findings
- Jan 2, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Nov 26, 2024Complaint2 findings
- Jul 18, 2024Complaint1 finding
Show the 15 earlier surveys
- Apr 11, 2023Standard and complaint11 findings · 1 harm
- Nov 10, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jul 25, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Mar 12, 2020Standard6 findings
- Jun 20, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
- Jan 28, 2019Standard2 findings
- Dec 21, 2017Standard1 finding
- Dec 9, 2016Standard and complaint6 findings
- Nov 16, 2015Standard2 findings
- Mar 2, 2015Complaint2 findings
- Sep 22, 2014Standard2 findings
- Aug 1, 2013—1 finding
- Sep 13, 2012—1 finding
- Dec 21, 2011—5 findings
- Jul 11, 2011—3 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Colonial Health & Rehab Center of Plainfield, LLCPlainfield3 harm findings
- Autumn Lake Healthcare at the WillowsWoodbridge1 harm finding
- Village Crest Center for Health & RehabilitationNew Milford3 harm findings
- Ark Healthcare & Rehabilitation at Governors HouseSimsbury1 harm finding
- Cheshire House Health Care Facility & Rehab CenterWaterburyno harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction