Deficiency Index

Majestic Care of Bloomington

Bloomington, Indiana · CCN 155019

22 surveys since 2011, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
72
Surveys
22
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/22

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
158
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Monroe
Medicare-certified since
1967

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=15, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Sep 8, 2025

427 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.633.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.56—
Annual nurse turnover34.8%46.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD562.5%E112.5%F112.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C112.5%
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 72 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Majestic Care of Bloomington, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Sep 8, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled with an open date for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. This had the potential to affect 99 out of 99 residents.Findings include:During an initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 9/2/25 at 10:05 a.m., an opened container of ranch dressing, an open container of salsa, an opened container of mustard, and an opened container of vanilla icing were observed without an opened date. The DM was observed to remove the items from the refrigerator, toss them, and he indicated the foods needed to have an open date. On 9/18/25 at 12:15 p.m., the Administrator provided the facility policy, LABELING & DATING GUIDELINES, revised on 12/12/23, and indicated it was the policy currently being used. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF688Sep 8, 2025

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing (nursing care designed to maintain functional ability of residents) of passive range of motion for 4 of 4 residents review for mobility. (Resident 3, Resident 25, Resident 70, and Resident 71) Findings include: 1.During an interview on 9/3/25 at 11:20 a.m., Resident 3 indicated she had a stroke and had limited range of motion (decreased ability to move a joint) of her left arm and hand. She did not get exercises anymore. At that time. Resident 3 was observed to have limited range of motion of her left arm and hand.On 9/8/25 at 10:20 a.m., CNA 1 was observed to provide morning care to Resident 3. At that time, no passive range of motion was provided. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF689Oct 28, 2021

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate supervision to prevent a resident to resident altercation for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 17 and Resident 4), the failed to ensure hot water temperatures remained at a safe and comfortable level, below 120 degrees Fahrenheit for 7 of 33 residents whose rooms were assessed for safe water temperature (Residents 12, 13, 14, 17, 33, 44, and 58), and the facility failed to ensure a safe environment after janitor's closet was found to be unlocked and unattended with hazardous materials for 1 of 1 janitor's closet observed during a random observation. Findings include: 1. Resident 17's clinical record was reviewed on 10/25/21 at 2:25 p.m. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jan 5, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure yellow zone (COVID-19 status unknown, being monitored due to potential exposure) staff discarded isolation gowns after resident care prior to leaving the residents' room and the facility failed to ensure washable isolation gowns were stored in a manner such that they remain clean until use for 1 of 2 yellow zones reviewed for infection control. This deficiency had the potential to affect 8 residents who resided in a yellow zone unit of 78 residents who resided in the nursing facility. Findings include: 1.) During an interview, on 1/5/21 at 9:45 a.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) Nurse indicated the facility had an increase of 8 COVID-19 residents in the last week. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF605Sep 8, 2025

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was administered psychotropic medications was monitored for adverse side effects for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 61)Finding includes: On 9/4/25 at 11:10 a.m., Resident 61's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, major depression, and bipolar disorder. The Physician's orders included, but were not limited to:- Ability (antipsychotic medication), 10 mg (milligrams) daily, initiated 1/23/25.- Buproprion (antidepressant medication) 100 mg, twice daily, initiated 8/30/25.- Trazadone (antidepressant medication) 0.5 mg, daily, initiated 5/15/25.- Citalopram (antidepressant medication) 40 mg, twice daily, initiated… […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 72 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Sep 8, 2025Standard4 findings
  • Jan 23, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 4, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Jan 31, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Oct 28, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Jan 5, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Nov 19, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Feb 24, 2020Standard3 findings
Show the 14 earlier surveys
  • Jan 23, 2019Standard7 findings
  • Jun 19, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 19, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Oct 31, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 5, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 5, 2017Standard3 findings
  • Nov 17, 2015Standard3 findings
  • Sep 16, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Jul 19, 2013—5 findings
  • Jun 12, 2012—3 findings
  • Apr 18, 2012Standard6 findings · 1 harm
  • Dec 13, 2011—2 findings
  • Jun 9, 2011—7 findings
  • Feb 10, 2011—6 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction