Deficiency Index

Coventry Meadows

Fort Wayne, Indiana · CCN 155756

30 surveys since 2011, 3 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
69
Surveys
30
Harm or worse
3
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file26/30

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
150
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES
County
Allen
Medicare-certified since
2006

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
2
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=15, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Mar 4, 2026

250 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.253.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.52—
Annual nurse turnover39.6%46.8%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD5100.0%E—F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 5 of the 69 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F6001×

    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

  • F6971×

    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Coventry Meadows, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF677Mar 1, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure showers and nail care were provided for 4 residents reviewed (Resident F, Resident K, Resident L, and Resident M). Findings include: On 2/27/23 at 1:38 P.M., the Resident Council President (RCP) was interviewed. She indicated everything was generally well within the facility except for some resident complaints about staffing. She indicated the facility used agency staff who were not familiar with residents routines. The RCP indicated there had been reports from some residents showers were not being given timely on 3 of the 5 hallways. 1. On 2/27/23 at 11:00 A.M., Resident F, identified by the facility as interviewable, was interviewed. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF679Oct 7, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure engaging activities were provided for 4 of 4 residents reviewed. (Resident 5, Resident 75, Resident 52, and Resident 30) Findings include: During a continuous observation, on 10/03/22 from 10:07 AM to 11:45AM, 20 residents were observed in the common area with no activities going on. There was 1 staff (activities) in an office with the door closed around the corner from the tables. The staff came handed out gallon size baggies with orbies (small squishy balls that swell with water) inside one to each table where people sat, 5 in total. After 18 minutes a second staff member came into the common area and activity staff began blowing bubbles. Resident 5 was not observed in the common room. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Oct 7, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper temperature of food. 124 residents resided in the facility. Findings include: During an observation on 10/03/22 09:06 AM, there was no thermometer observed in the walk in refridgerator. The Dietary Manager (CDM) was unable to provide temperature logs for October. In an interview, the CDM indicated October was a new month and she was unable to provide logs. The CDM indicated she was working 12hr days 7 days a week therefore she could ensure they were taken and within range. The CDM was unable to recall what the temps were on the night prior and asked a Cook for them. The Cook indicated the soup was 175 degrees and the tuna salad was 38. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Nov 4, 2021

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to properly prevent COVID-19 by wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) properly for 11 of 11 observations. (Employee 1, Employee 2, Employee 3, Employee 4, Employee 5, Employee 6, Employee 7, and Employee 8) Findings include: During observation on 11/4/21 at 12:45 P.M., Employee 8 was sitting at the front desk screening visiting medical providers and employees. Employee 8 was wearing a mask, but no face shield or goggles. During an interview at the same time, Employee 8 indicated if she had to walk to resident areas, then she needed to wear a shield. During observation on 11/4/21 at 12:48 P.M., Employee 7 was wearing her N95 mask with the bottom strap undone, not around her head. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Oct 14, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitation and storage practices were followed in the kitchen, pantries, and during meal service. There were 121 of 122 residents who ate their meals from the facility kitchen. Findings include: 1. An observation of the door entrance to the main kitchen on 10-6-2021 at 9:46 a.m., indicated the secured door entry was in the main dining room. The door was scuffed and appeared dirty with light brown areas on the door and frame. An observation of the walk-in refrigerator on 10-6-2021 at 9:55 a.m., indicated on the shelves to the right of the opening, there were containers without a label describing the contents and the date it was placed in the refrigerator or the use by date. […]

Read 23 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 23 of 69 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Mar 4, 2026Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 25, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Nov 6, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 25, 2023Standard2 findings
  • Mar 1, 2023Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 7, 2022Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Nov 4, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Oct 14, 2021Standard5 findings
Show the 22 earlier surveys
  • Mar 8, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 1, 2020Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 16, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Dec 3, 2018Standard2 findings
  • Oct 3, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 27, 2017Standard4 findings
  • Aug 31, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 26, 2016Standard7 findings · 1 harm
  • Oct 30, 2015Standard and complaint6 findings
  • Sep 24, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • May 11, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 10, 2015Complaint1 finding
  • Oct 10, 2014Standard4 findings
  • Jul 15, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 16, 2014Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 25, 2013—1 finding
  • Mar 12, 2013—2 findings
  • Feb 5, 2013—1 finding
  • Oct 19, 2012—3 findings
  • May 15, 2012—3 findings
  • Aug 26, 2011—8 findings
  • Feb 4, 2011—2 findings · 2 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction