Deficiency Index

Madison Healthcare Services

Madison, Minnesota · CCN 245382

24 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2019.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
91
Surveys
24
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file18/24

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
51
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
Independent
County
Lac Qui Parle · rural
Medicare-certified since
1986

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 123 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.

Last survey on record

Jan 27, 2026

286 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.224.22
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.69—
Annual nurse turnover100.0%42.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$10,036 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ16.3%K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1381.3%E212.5%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 16 of the 91 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F5582×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

  • F6362×

    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F5541×

    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

  • F5801×

    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Madison Healthcare Services, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Feb 28, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the resident safety from accident and hazards for 1 of 1 resident (R149) who smoked unsupervised while using oxygen via nasal cannula that was connected to a compressed oxygen (O2) canister. This resulted in an immediate risk of serious harm, injury, or death, from thermal burns to R149. In addition, the facility failed to follow facility policy and secure smoking materials (cigarettes and lighter) away from R149. The IJ began on 2/19/24 when R149 was admitted to the facility (a non-smoking facility) and with facility knowledge, smoked unsupervised while wearing oxygen upon her admission. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Apr 14, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision and comprehensively assess exit seeking behaviors for 1 of 1 resident (R1). This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) when R1 was able to repeatedly exit the East door to the facility on to an unsafe walkway with stairs to one side and a sloped sidewalk to the other. The IJ began on 3/25/22, when R1 exited the building and was observed outside by a visitor. Staff were notified and R1 was returned to the building. R1 was not comprehensively re-assessed at that time to determine causative factors, needed interventions, or was provided appropriate supervision when exhibiting those behaviors to prevent R1 from further attempts to exit the building to return home. […]

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Oct 7, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to develop elopement prevention interventions upon R1's admission even though R1 was at moderate risk for elopement, and staff were aware R1's had exit seeking attempts before R1 successfully eloped from the facility. The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 9/23/21 at 1:03 p.m., when it was determined the facility failed to provide elopement prevention interventions and R1 eloped. The chief executive officer and interim director of nursing (DON) was informed of the IJ on 10/6/21, at 6:29 p.m. The IJ was removed on 10/7/21, at 2:38 p.m. however, non-compliance remained at an isolated scope and severity which indicated no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm (Level D). […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Dec 17, 2021

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to properly implement fall prevention interventions to prevent reoccurring falls for 2 of 3 residents (R5, R3) reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for R5, who sustained thoracic spine comprehension fractures. Findings include: R5's Face Sheet dated 7/11/19, indicated R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with initial diagnoses of weakness and repeated falls. R5's Diagnosis Report updated 12/13/21, added the diagnosis of wedge compression fracture of thoracic vertebra. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Aug 12, 2021

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate signage was posted and appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) worn by all staff on 1 of 1 (quarantined for potential COVID) designated unit housing 20 of 39 residents (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6, R7, R9, R10, R14, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R30, R32, and R37). The facility also failed to appropriately document 3 of 3 residents (R1, R5, and R10) identified symptoms of potential COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 91 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 27, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Jan 16, 2026Complaint2 findings
  • Jun 4, 2025Complaint3 findings
  • Nov 6, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Feb 28, 2024Standard4 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 17, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 1, 2023Standard5 findings
  • Apr 14, 2022Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
Show the 16 earlier surveys
  • Dec 17, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 7, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 12, 2021Standard4 findings
  • Jul 22, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Jan 22, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • May 7, 2020Infection control1 finding
  • Aug 23, 2019Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 1, 2019Standard4 findings
  • May 23, 2018Standard11 findings
  • Jul 20, 2017Standard4 findings
  • May 5, 2016Standard4 findings
  • Jun 25, 2015Standard2 findings
  • May 21, 2014Standard14 findings
  • Apr 10, 2013—4 findings
  • Jun 28, 2012—13 findings
  • Aug 18, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction