Deficiency Index

Good Samaritan Society - International Falls

International Falls, Minnesota · CCN 245318

23 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2020.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
129
Surveys
23
Harm or worse
5
Immediate jeopardy
3
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy3

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file19/23

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
54
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
County
Koochiching · rural
Medicare-certified since
1986

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
3
Staffing
5
Quality measures
2

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat more weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 123 not-for-profit facilities with fewer than 66 beds in Minnesota.

Last survey on record

Jan 14, 2026

299 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.084.22
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.07—
Annual nurse turnover43.3%42.1%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$8,190 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG13.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2170.0%E26.7%F413.3%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B13.3%C13.3%
CMS’s current file: 30 of the 129 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F6412×

    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

  • F6772×

    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.

  • F6892×

    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

  • F6992×

    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Good Samaritan Society - International Falls, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Immediate jeopardy, isolatedF689Jun 29, 2022

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to The facility failed to provide adequate supervision by appropriately trained staff when a home maker (HM-A) staff assisted a resident, not utilizing care planned interventions and resulting in a fall with fracture. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility that required assistance from staff for ambulation. In addition, the facility failed to implement care planned interventions for 1 of 3 residents (R3). The immediate jeopardy began on 6/20/22, when an unlicensed/non-certified (HM-A) staff assisted R1 to the bathroom while not utilizing care planned interventions resulting in a fall with fracture. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the immediate jeopardy at 4:00 pm. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Jan 19, 2024

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to reduce the risk of falls for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who had a history of falls with serious injury. This resulted in actual harm for R1 who fell and sustained a laceration to her head and a subdural hematoma (pool of blood between the brain and its outermost covering). In addition, the facility failed to develop a sustainable plan for ongoing supervision. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment and indicated she was dependent on staff for transfers. The MDS indicated R1 did not have a fall since the prior assessment. R1's care plan dated 10/29/23, identified a communication problem related to dementia and a self care deficit. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF838Nov 25, 2024

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to review and update the facility assessment to incorporate the minimal staff requirements; and all resources and conditions to care for the resident populations. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: The Facility assessment dated [DATE], identified the need to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The assessment listed resident count, activities of daily living (ADL) assistance needed, behavioral symptoms and active diagnoses. The facility utilized an interdisciplinary approach to meet the needs of residents across all shifts, including nights and weekends. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF867Nov 25, 2024

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop action plans for identified areas of monitoring and failed to identify and implement at least one process improvement project (PIP) This had the potential to affect all 50 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: The Quality Assurance, Action Committee Meeting Minutes dated 7/11/24, identified the team had reviewed the following topics: -infection control. -emergency operation plan and facility assessment. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Nov 25, 2024

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement an infection control surveillance plan for identifying, tracking, monitoring and/or reporting infections and communicable disease along with a monthly analysis; and failed to conduct COVID-19 testing of staff and residents per Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines. In addition, the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 resident (R205) reviewed with pressure ulcers; and failed to wear a mask during a peripherally inserted central catheter (PIIC) line dressing change for 1 of 1 resident (R206) reviewed with a PIIC. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all 50 residents residing in the facility. […]

Read 24 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 24 of 129 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 14, 2026Standard3 findings
  • Nov 25, 2024Standard14 findings
  • Jan 19, 2024Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Oct 19, 2023Standard12 findings
  • May 25, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 2, 2022Standard and complaint4 findings
  • Jun 29, 2022Complaint2 findings · 1 harm
  • Apr 27, 2022Complaint2 findings
Show the 15 earlier surveys
  • Mar 31, 2022Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 1, 2021Standard5 findings
  • Nov 6, 2020Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Feb 5, 2020Complaint19 findings · 2 harm
  • Apr 5, 2019Standard5 findings
  • Nov 2, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • May 3, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Dec 26, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Apr 12, 2017Standard6 findings
  • Mar 17, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Jan 29, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Mar 27, 2014Standard5 findings
  • Aug 15, 2013—10 findings
  • Sep 20, 2012—8 findings
  • Sep 2, 2011—10 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction