Deficiency Index

Lutheran Senior Services at Meramec Bluffs

Ballwin, Missouri · CCN 265805

13 surveys since 2011, 1 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
41
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file9/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
32
Ownership
Non profit - Church related
Chain
EVERTRUE
County
St. Louis
Medicare-certified since
2007

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Dec 29, 2025

315 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day5.254.52
Registered-nurse hours per resident day1.52—
Annual nurse turnover27.1%45.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD675.0%E112.5%F112.5%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 8 of the 41 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Lutheran Senior Services at Meramec Bluffs, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF919Dec 7, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner and to ensure all clinical nursing staff carried a call light pager per the facility's call light exception, approved by the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS). This affected three of three residents sampled for call light concerns (Residents #18, #8 and #1). The census was 68 with 24 residents in certified beds. Review of the facility's exception letter, approved by DHSS, dated 7/28/20, showed for each approval listed, the facility is required to comply with the stipulations that follow: -The operator will ensure that all direct care staff carry and utilize the wireless nurse call pagers at all times; -The operator will ensure that a wireless nurse call system… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF580Dec 29, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify Next of Kin (NOK) of a resident fall for one resident (Resident #1). The sample size was three. The census was 67. Review of the facility's Event Reporting Policy, revised 7/29/21, showed: -Policy statement: Event reporting is essential to providing resident and client care. Events involving a resident, visitor, or other person (non-employee) that are outside of usual or normal happenings and present a potential liability, and events that are not in keeping with standards, policies, procedures or practices and may have an adverse outcome will be documented. The documentation of an event and its investigation, outside of what is documented in the medical chart, is confidential. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF689Dec 29, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services per acceptable standards of practice for one resident (Resident #1), when facility staff failed to use a gait belt when transferring the resident from the floor to the wheelchair. The sample size was 3. The census was 67.Review of the facility's Event Reporting Policy, revised 7/29/21, showed: -Policy statement: Event reporting is essential to providing resident and client care. Events involving a resident, visitor, or other person (non-employee) that are outside of usual or normal happenings and present a potential liability, and events that are not in keeping with standards, policies, procedures or practices and may have an adverse outcome will be documented. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF688Oct 9, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #20) with limited mobility, received appropriate equipment and assistance to maintain mobility when staff failed to ensure the resident wore palm protectors properly and daily in accordance with physician orders and recommendations by therapy to address hand contractures (fixed tightening of muscle, tendons, ligaments, or skin, preventing normal movement). The sample was 12. The census was 43 with 29 residents in certified beds. Review of Resident #20's medical record, showed: -Diagnoses included contracture to unspecified joint, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia; -A physician order, dated 5/23/24, for restorative - splint/brace. […]

Read 21 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 21 of 41 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Dec 29, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Oct 9, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Dec 7, 2022Standard1 finding
  • Jun 21, 2019Standard4 findings
  • Jun 5, 2018Standard3 findings
  • May 25, 2017Standard2 findings
  • Apr 1, 2016Standard3 findings
  • Jun 30, 2015Standard7 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Jul 24, 2014Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Mar 21, 2014Standard6 findings
  • Jun 11, 2013—4 findings
  • Apr 3, 2012—4 findings
  • Mar 9, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction