Deficiency Index

Lake Regional Health Systems

Osage Beach, Missouri · CCN 265429

4 surveys since 2018, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
13
Surveys
4
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2018–2024
’18’20’24
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file3/4

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
16
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Camden · rural
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
4
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=7, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jan 18, 2024

1,026 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day9.334.52
Registered-nurse hours per resident day4.31—
Annual nurse turnover61.9%45.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD—E266.7%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C133.3%
CMS’s current file: 3 of the 13 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Lake Regional Health Systems, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Aug 23, 2022

    Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to store food in a manner to protect it from potential contamination and out-dated use. The facility census was seven. 1. Review of the facility's Storage of Food-Labeling, Storing and Dating policy, dated 11/09/16, showed: -Cold items are put into storage containers, covered, labeled and dated with and in and discard date before they are refrigerated. -Once a week, the walk-in and all refrigerators are thoroughly cleaned. Any any time, any food dated longer than seven days is discarded. Freezer leftovers are not kept longer than a year. -Manufacturers recommended storage dates are used when storing food. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF607Jan 18, 2024

    Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to check the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) Registry to ensure staff did not have a Federal Indicator (a marker given by the federal government to individuals who have committed abuse and/or neglect) in accordance with the facility policy for six current employee's ([NAME] Patient Care Technician (PCT) I, student nurse intern J, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K, housekeeper L, PCT M, and Health Unit Coordinator N out of seven sampled staff. The facility census was 5. 1. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Jan 18, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to conduct or complete entrapment assessments and measurements to identify areas of possible entrapment prior to the use of bed rails on admission for four residents (Resident #255, #256, #257, and #258) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 5. 1. Review of the facility's policies showed the facility did not provide a policy for entrapment assessments. 2. Review of Resident #255's medical record showed the record did not contain a completed entrapment assessment. Observation on 01/17/24 at 4:18 P.M., showed the resident in bed with bilateral bedrails in the upright position. 3. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF700Aug 23, 2022

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to attempt alternative interventions prior to the use of bedrails for six residents (Resident #2, #4, #5, #6, #7 and #202). Additionally, staff failed to obtain resident and/or guardian consent for the use of the bedrails, and failed to update the residents care plans for bedrail use. The facility census was 7. 1. Review of the facility's General Patient Care Policy, dated 12/21/21, showed one bed rail may be used. Patients will be educated on the risk of entrapment and must sign a consent form to have the bed rail up. […]

  • No harm, potential for minimal, widespreadF655Jan 18, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to develop baseline care plans to provide effective and person-centered care for three admitted residents (Resident #257,#258, #259). The facility census was 5. 1. Review of the facility's Patient Plan of Care - Skilled Nursing Facility, revised 01/09/20, showed staff are directed as follows: -An interim care plan is developed immediately after admission by nursing, dietary, and other disciplines as required to cover immediate needs of the patient; -The plan of care will be printed and given to the patient within 48 hours of admission with a current copy of active medication orders. Assessment: -The initial assessment is done on the day of admission. […]

Read all 13 findings in full →

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jan 18, 2024Standard3 findings
  • Aug 23, 2022Standard4 findings
  • Nov 14, 2019Standard1 finding
  • Oct 17, 2018Standard5 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction