Deficiency Index

Jeanne Jugan Center

Kansas City, Missouri · CCN 26A292

13 surveys since 2011, and no finding has been recorded at harm level.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
75
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
0
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2025
’11’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worseNone

No finding on record has been cited at harm level or above.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file10/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
52
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Jackson
Medicare-certified since
1988

CMS ratings

Overall
5
Health inspection
5
Staffing
5
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=4, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Aug 6, 2025

460 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.934.52
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.62—
Annual nurse turnover34.1%45.3%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD—E375.0%F125.0%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 4 of the 75 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Jeanne Jugan Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF880Feb 26, 2024

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a comprehensive infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of water-borne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease), and failed to provide documented assessments for such an outbreak with accepted response protocols, in accordance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who resided, visited, used, or worked in the facility. The facility census was 24 residents with a licensed capacity for 26 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Observation on 2/21/24 between 1:38 P.M. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Aug 6, 2025

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the proper labeling and/or disposal of foodstuffs to preserve their freshness, in accordance with State of Missouri rules and regulations, established national guidelines, and professional standards for food service safety and to wear proper hair restraints when handling food. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who ate food from the kitchen. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF567Aug 18, 2022

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act in the best interests of their residents who held a Resident Trust Fund (RTF) by not securing their monies in an interest bearing bank account. The deficient practice affected 19 residents who authorized the facility to manage their monies and funds. The facility census was 24 residents. 1. Record review of the facility's individual RTF bank statements dated, August 2021 to July 2022, showed these bank accounts to be non-interest bearing accounts for all of the residents who had a RTF with the facility. The average 12-month balance of these statements was $83,146.55. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF732Aug 18, 2022

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post required nurse staffing information, which included the total and actual hours worked by direct care staff who were directly responsible for resident care, per shift on a daily basis and visible for residents, visitors, and staff to view. The facility census was 24 residents. Record review of the facility's policy Posting Direct Care Staffing Numbers dated 7/2005 showed: -The number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents would be posted on a daily basis for each shift. -The number of licensed nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) who provide direct care would be posted. 1. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 75 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Aug 6, 2025Standard1 finding
  • Feb 26, 2024Standard1 finding
  • Aug 18, 2022Standard2 findings
  • Dec 13, 2019Standard19 findings
  • Dec 14, 2018Standard9 findings
  • Oct 15, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 13, 2017Standard12 findings
  • Oct 4, 2016Standard3 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Nov 9, 2015Standard7 findings
  • Oct 6, 2014Standard8 findings
  • Aug 29, 2013—4 findings
  • Aug 17, 2012—5 findings
  • Jul 22, 2011—3 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction