Deficiency Index

Loveland Care Center

Loveland, Ohio · CCN 365427

13 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2026.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
53
Surveys
13
Harm or worse
1
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2011–2026
’11’15’20’25’26
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse1

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/13

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
89
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Warren
Medicare-certified since
1979

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
3
Staffing
2
Quality measures
4

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

May 6, 2026

187 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day3.703.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.35—
Annual nurse turnover55.7%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$13,870 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG14.3%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD1773.9%E313.0%F28.7%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 23 of the 53 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F8803×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F7612×

    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

  • F8122×

    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

  • F5501×

    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

  • F5581×

    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Loveland Care Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF684May 6, 2026

    THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of outside provider office notes, review of hospital records, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments were implemented for a resident. This resulted in Actual Harm on 08/08/25 when the facility failed to implement the orthopedic surgeon's orders for treatment to Resident #2's left ankle surgical wound. Subsequently, Resident #2 was admitted to the hospital for an infection to the left ankle surgical wound, which was treated with debridement, placement of a wound vac, and intravenous (IV) antibiotics. This affected one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for surgical wounds. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812Apr 17, 2025

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly label and store food as well as ensure expired products were disposed of. The facility also failed to maintain clean equipment. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 73. Findings include: 1. Observations on [DATE] from 8:00 A.M. to 8:15 A.M., in the kitchen, revealed a shallow pan with croutons, covered not dated and a pan with rolls covered with plastic wrap not dated. Observation of the ice machine outside of the kitchen had a scoop in an attached container. The container holding the scoop had a yellow sludge on the bottom with stagnant water. The container had no holes for drainage. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF814Apr 17, 2025

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure the garbage cans in the kitchen food preparation area garbage receptacles were covered to prevent cross contamination and pest control. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 73 residents. Findings include: Observation on 04/16/25 at 9:05 A.M., revealed the kitchen garbage receptacle by the primary handwashing sink and the garbage receptacle on the opposite side of the dishwashing sink next to a prep-area counter were not covered. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF812Apr 25, 2022

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure supplies used in the kitchen were clean. This had the potential to affect 60 residents who received food from the kitchen and utilized kitchen dishes. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Tour of the kitchen on 04/19/22 at 8:20 A.M. revealed an orange industrial floor fan was observed to have a brown like substance build up located on the inside blades and the exterior grill face of the fan. The fan was on and blowing air directly onto clean dishes. On 04/19/22 at 8:25 A.M. interview with Dietary Manager #25 revealed the fan was on daily because the kitchen got extremely hot while washing the dishes. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Apr 25, 2022

    Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when interacting with a resident (Resident #367) on droplet isolation. This affected one resident (#367) out of four residents reviewed for infection control and had the potential to affect eight additional residents (#16, #39, #58, #62, #167, #168, #169, and #171) being cared for by the same staff members. The facility census was 61. Findings Included: Medical record review for Resident #367 revealed an admitted [DATE]. diagnosis [MEDICAL RECORD OR PHYSICIAN ORDER] . […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 53 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • May 6, 2026Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Apr 17, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Nov 7, 2024Complaint7 findings
  • Aug 26, 2024Complaint2 findings
  • Apr 25, 2022Standard9 findings
  • Apr 4, 2019Standard3 findings
  • Jun 28, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Apr 20, 2017Standard3 findings
Show the 5 earlier surveys
  • Jan 28, 2016Standard2 findings
  • Jan 21, 2014Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 12, 2013—2 findings
  • Sep 23, 2011—3 findings
  • Jan 28, 2011—14 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction