Deficiency Index

Dunbar Health & Rehab Center

Dayton, Ohio · CCN 366157

35 surveys since 2010, 2 of them producing a finding at harm level or worse.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
92
Surveys
35
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
1
The record, 2010–2025
’10’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Immediate jeopardy1

Findings at the most serious level CMS records.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file26/35

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
68
Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Chain
SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP
County
Montgomery
Medicare-certified since
1998

CMS ratings

Overall
3
Health inspection
2
Staffing
3
Quality measures
5

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Since 2021, this facility recorded somewhat fewer weighted findings than its peer group.

Weighted by harm level, against 391 for-profit facilities of 66–99 beds in Ohio.

Last survey on record

Jun 18, 2025

509 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.383.47
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.81—
Annual nurse turnover62.1%49.2%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

No fines, payment denials or special-focus designation on the current CMS record.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG—H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD2281.5%E311.1%F27.4%
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 27 of the 92 citations on record.

Most frequently cited here

In CMS’s current monthly file.

  • F6102×

    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

  • F7552×

    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

  • F8802×

    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

  • F5651×

    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.

  • F6091×

    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Dunbar Health & Rehab Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF803May 1, 2025

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure portion sizes were served as planned. This had the potential to affect 57 of 63 residents in the facility. The facility identified six residents (#167, #54, #62, #48, #49, and #43) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the dietary spreadsheet for the lunch meal on 04/30/25 revealed the serving size for the rice was 1/2 cup, sliced carrots was 1/2 cup, and ground chicken was 3 ounces. Observation on 04/30/25 at 11:04 A.M. revealed [NAME] #735 making plates for the lunch meal. [NAME] #735 utilized a #12 scoop (1/3 cup) for the sliced carrots, a #20 scoop (1 5/8 ounces) for the ground chicken, and a #16 scoop (1/4 cup) for the rice. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, widespreadF812May 1, 2025

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the steam table was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 57 of 63 residents in the facility. The facility identified six residents (#167, #54, #62, #48, #49, and #43) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Observation on 04/30/25 at 10:26 A.M. revealed the water wells of the steam table in the kitchen contained a yellowish-brown liquid with debris floating at the top and brown sediment around the bottom and edges of each well. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565May 1, 2025

    Based on the review of Resident Council meeting minutes, resident interview, and staff interviews, the facility failed to document and follow up on resident concerns from the resident council meetings. This affected 10 out of 10 members of Resident council who regularly attended the meetings and had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The facility census is 63. Findings include: Review of Resident Council meetings minutes from August 2024 to March 2025 revealed the facility did not follow up on concerns brought forward at the Resident Council meetings. Review of the meeting minutes revealed the resolutions from the last meeting concerns were left blank. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF636Aug 22, 2023

    Based on record reviews, staff interview, and review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure residents comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed timely. This affected four (#10, #16, #110, and #118) out of the four residents reviewed for comprehensive MDS assessments. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admitted [DATE] with medical diagnoses of convulsions cerebral infarction, and psychotic disorder. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission MDS with assessment reference date (ARD) of 05/21/23 revealed the MDS had a completion date of 06/23/23. 2. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF638Aug 22, 2023

    Based on record reviews, staff interview, and review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure residents quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed timely. This affected five (#8, #18, #78, #108, and #124) residents out of the six residents reviewed for quarterly MDS assessments. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admitted [DATE] with medical diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation, anxiety, and obesity. Review of the medical record revealed a quarterly MDS assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/20/23 revealed the MDS had a completion date of 07/09/23. 2. […]

Read 22 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 22 of 92 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 18, 2025Complaint1 finding
  • May 1, 2025Standard and complaint8 findings
  • Feb 20, 2025Complaint2 findings
  • Mar 5, 2024Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 22, 2023Complaint2 findings
  • Aug 2, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Jul 17, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 1, 2022Standard6 findings
Show the 27 earlier surveys
  • Dec 9, 2021Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 16, 2021Infection control1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Feb 5, 2020Complaint1 finding
  • Sep 26, 2019Standard and complaint5 findings
  • Aug 22, 2019Complaint3 findings · 1 harm
  • Jun 24, 2019Complaint1 finding
  • Dec 6, 2018Complaint1 finding
  • Aug 16, 2018Standard4 findings
  • Jul 11, 2017Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 9, 2017Standard and complaint13 findings
  • Jan 20, 2017Complaint2 findings
  • Nov 22, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Nov 9, 2016Complaint4 findings
  • Sep 21, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Jun 23, 2016Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 10, 2016Standard6 findings
  • Feb 9, 2016Complaint2 findings
  • Dec 11, 2014Standard and complaint2 findings
  • Sep 19, 2013—3 findings
  • Dec 7, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 5, 2012—2 findings
  • Jun 29, 2012—4 findings
  • May 1, 2012—1 finding
  • Sep 2, 2011—2 findings
  • Mar 18, 2011—2 findings
  • Sep 29, 2010—4 findings · 1 harm

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction