Linden Ponds
Hingham, Massachusetts · CCN 225773
16 surveys since 2011. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2026.
Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.
- Citations on record
- 45
- Surveys
- 16
- Harm or worse
- 2
- Immediate jeopardy
- 0
Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.
Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.
The facility
- Certified beds
- 132
- Ownership
- Non profit - Corporation
- Chain
- ERICKSON SENIOR LIVING
- County
- Plymouth
- Medicare-certified since
- 2009
CMS ratings
- Overall
- 4
- Health inspection
- 3
- Staffing
- 4
- Quality measures
- 5
CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.
Compared with similar facilities
Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=9, floor 20).
Last survey on record
Apr 30, 2026
193 days ago.
Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.
Staffing
| Measure | This facility | Peer median |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse hours per resident day | 5.15 | 3.89 |
| Registered-nurse hours per resident day | 0.82 | — |
| Annual nurse turnover | 41.0% | 37.5% |
As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.
Enforcement
- Fines
- $12,735 across 1 penalty
Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.
Severity of recent findings
| Severity | Isolated | Pattern | Widespread |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate jeopardy | J— | K— | L— |
| Actual harm | G233.3% | H— | I— |
| No harm, potential for more than minimal | D350.0% | E116.7% | F— |
| No harm, potential for minimal | A— | B— | C— |
In the surveyor’s words
From the most serious findings on record at Linden Ponds, in the surveyor’s own words.
- Actual harm, isolatedF656Feb 11, 2026
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1) whose individualized comprehensive plan of care and resident care card, indicated interventions included that two staff members were required to provide assistance with bathing, dressing and bed mobility, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed his/her care plan interventions, when on 01/14/26, Care Associate #1 provided care and repositioned Resident #1 without another staff member present to assist her, Resident #1 slid off the bed, and landed face down on the floor and was noted to be bleeding from a laceration on his/her forehead. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation and required seven sutures to close the wound. […]
- Actual harm, isolatedF689Feb 11, 2026
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required the assistance of two staff members with bathing, dressing and bed mobility, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance during care in an effort to maintain his/her safety and prevent an incident/accident resulting in an injury. On 01/14/26, Care Associate #1 provided care and repositioned Resident #1 without another staff member present to assist her, Resident #1 slid off the bed, and landed face down on the floor. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF565Apr 30, 2026
Based on review of Resident Council Minutes, a resident group meeting, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure grievances brought forward from the Resident Council were addressed and promptly resolved to ensure the residents felt their concerns were acted upon timely and included the facility response to the group.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Resident or Family Group Meeting, dated as revised February 2022, indicated but was not limited to:The group approved staff person:-Types up group meeting minutes and distributes to department heads as applicable.-If any concerns are conveyed in the resident group meeting, department heads respond to the group approved designated staff member within 2 weeks with a written action plan.-Action plans and minutes are… […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF880Jan 20, 2021
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure that staff implemented infection prevention and control practices. Specifically, facility staff failed to change gloves when soiled, appropriately extend the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), and wear the appropriate PPE for high contact care to reduce the risk of potential transmission of COVID-19 within the facility. Findings include: Review of the guidance The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) strategies for optimizing the supply of N95 respirators, updated 11/23/20 indicated: -Reuse refers to the practice of using the same N95 respirator by one Health Care Provider (HCP) for multiple encounters but removing it (i.e. […]
- No harm, potential for more than minimal, isolatedF880Apr 30, 2026
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards of practice to prevent contamination and the potential spread of infections for two Residents (#14 and #3), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #14, to implement Contact Precautions (infection control measures used to prevent the spread of infection through direct or indirect contact with residents or contaminated surfaces); and2. […]
Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 45 on record.
Every survey on record
FindingsAt actual harm or above
- Apr 30, 2026Standard2 findings
- Feb 11, 2026Complaint2 findings · 2 harm
- Apr 15, 2025Complaint1 finding
- Feb 26, 2025Standard1 finding
- Jun 3, 2022Standard2 findings
- Jan 20, 2021Infection control1 finding
- Aug 25, 2020Infection control1 finding
- Jul 16, 2020Infection control1 finding
Show the 8 earlier surveys
- Aug 13, 2019Standard10 findings
- May 29, 2018Standard10 findings
- Feb 2, 2017Standard3 findings
- Oct 26, 2015Standard2 findings
- Jul 10, 2013—1 finding
- May 10, 2012—1 finding
- Mar 17, 2011—2 findings
- Mar 10, 2011—5 findings
Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.
Comparable facilities
The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.
- Rivercrest Long Term CareW Concordno harm findings
- South Cove Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterQuincyno harm findings
- Bethany Skilled Nursing FacilityFramingham3 harm findings
- Lutheran Rehabilitation and Skilled Care CenterWorcester1 harm finding
- Alden Court Nursing Care & Rehabilitation CenterFairhaven2 harm findings
Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction