Deficiency Index

Alden Court Nursing Care & Rehabilitation Center

Fairhaven, Massachusetts · CCN 225387

10 surveys since 2012. The first finding at harm level was recorded in 2021.

Data as of , released by CMS on October 8, 2026. Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog.

Citations on record
32
Surveys
10
Harm or worse
2
Immediate jeopardy
0
The record, 2012–2025
’12’15’20’25
No harm recordedHarm or worseNot surveyed
Harm or worse2

Findings where a surveyor recorded actual harm to a resident.

Beyond CMS’s monthly file7/10

Older surveys no longer in CMS’s monthly file or on Care Compare. They are shown here.

The facility

Certified beds
142
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Chain
Independent
County
Bristol
Medicare-certified since
1990

CMS ratings

Overall
4
Health inspection
4
Staffing
3
Quality measures
3

CMS’s own Five-Star ratings.

Compared with similar facilities

Not shown for this facility: too few citations in window (n=13, floor 20).

Last survey on record

Jun 11, 2025

516 days ago.

Counts surveys with at least one finding. A clean survey leaves no record here, so the real gap may be shorter.

Staffing

MeasureThis facilityPeer median
Nurse hours per resident day4.243.89
Registered-nurse hours per resident day0.51—
Annual nurse turnover57.2%37.5%

As reported by the facility to CMS, beside the peer-group median.

Enforcement

Fines
$209,335 across 1 penalty

Federal civil money penalties and remedies as CMS currently publishes them. Amounts may still be under appeal.

Severity of recent findings

Citations by CMS scope and severity. Rows are harm level, columns are how widespread the finding was.
SeverityIsolatedPatternWidespread
Immediate jeopardyJ—K—L—
Actual harmG19.1%H—I—
No harm, potential for more than minimalD654.5%E436.4%F—
No harm, potential for minimalA—B—C—
CMS’s current file: 11 of the 32 citations on record.

In the surveyor’s words

From the most serious findings on record at Alden Court Nursing Care & Rehabilitation Center, in the surveyor’s own words.

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Mar 21, 2023

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions resulting in a fall with cervical fractures and a subsequent fall with hospitalization for one Resident (#80), out of a sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Falls Management Program, dated as revised 11/23/21, indicated the goals of the falls management program are to identify residents at risk, lower their risk by ensuring implementation of procedures to prevent or minimize damage caused by falls, and to remove accident hazards. […]

  • Actual harm, isolatedF689Nov 15, 2021

    Based on records reviewed and interviews of one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was admitted to the Facility for short term rehabilitation related to a left humeral fracture (break in upper end of upper arm bone), was non-weight bearing to left upper extremity, was assessed as being a high risk for falls and required staff assistance for transfers, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided adequate assistance during a transfer to maintain safety and prevent an incident resulting in injury. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF686Jun 11, 2025

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#84), out of a total sample of 26 residents received the necessary care and treatment to promote wound healing. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure treatment orders were transcribed accurately and for the correct wound location per the Wound Physician's recommendations. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, #9324, dated as last revised April 11, 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the responsibility of the licensed nurse to ensure that there is a proper patient care order from a duly authorized prescriber prior to the administration of any prescription or non-prescription… […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF699Jun 11, 2025

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed for one Resident (#84), out of a total sample of 26 residents, to assess their history of trauma and failed to develop a plan of care accounting for the Resident's experiences and preferences to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed and Culturally Competent Care, dated as last revised [DATE], indicated but was not limited to the following: -Trauma Informed Care is an approach to delivering care that involves understanding, recognizing and responding to the effects of all types of traumas. […]

  • No harm, potential for more than minimal, patternF760Jul 23, 2024

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#8) was free from significant medication errors, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered according to the pain scale indicated in the physician's orders. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administration Procedures For All Medications, dated last revised July 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Policy: to administer medications in a safe and effective manner. - Obtain and record any vital signs or other monitoring parameters ordered or deemed necessary prior to medication administration. […]

Read 20 findings in full →The most serious and the most recent: 20 of 32 on record.

Every survey on record

FindingsAt actual harm or above

  • Jun 11, 2025Standard2 findings
  • Jul 23, 2024Standard4 findings
  • May 31, 2023Complaint1 finding
  • Mar 21, 2023Standard5 findings · 1 harm
  • Nov 15, 2021Complaint1 finding · 1 harm
  • Aug 31, 2018Standard6 findings
  • Jan 8, 2015Standard8 findings
  • Nov 12, 2013—2 findings
Show the 2 earlier surveys
  • Jul 18, 2013—1 finding
  • Aug 22, 2012—2 findings

Surveys that found no deficiencies are not in CMS’s files and do not appear here.

Comparable facilities

The nearest facilities to this one in the same peer group, by weighted findings.

Deficiency Index is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or approved by CMS, Medicare, or any government agency. About this data · Report a correction